Armed Forces Tribunal
Smt Dapoo Bai wdo Late AC-2 Meghwal KL vs UOI & Others on 29 January 2026
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, JAIPUR
16.
MA(E) 70/2025 in OA 576/2012
Smt Dapoo Bai, wd/o Late AC2 Meghwal KL
…. Applicant
Versus
UOI & Others
…. Respondents
For Applicant
: Mr. MS Solanki, Pihu Singh Rajawat, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Pyare Lal, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR, MEMBER (J)
HON’BLE MR. SANJIV MITTAL, MEMBER (A)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
29.01.2026
1. During the course of hearing, Counsel for the Applicant submits that compliance of Order dated 04/9/2012 passed by this Tribunal has not been complied with in letter and spirit, depriving the applicant of her legitimate dues.
2. We have perused the material on record.
3. Perusal of record reveals that vide Order dated 04/9/2012 in OA No 576/2012 filed by the applicant, this Tribunal had directed the PCDA to look into the matter from all aspects thoroughly and closely as narrated in the Order. Perusal of Annexure MA/2, also reveals that Central Bank of India, CPPC, Central Office, Mumbai – 400 023, had also raised the matter to the Treasury Office, Bundi, Rajasthan, with regard to grant of lifetime arrears of payment of family pension to the applicant wef April 1972 to November, 2015. The letter had also stated about the Family Pension having been paid to the applicant by the Treasury Office till 1972 and discontinued thereafter.
4. In view of the foregoing and since the OA was filed by the applicant after a delay of 40 years and the MA Execution Application itself was filed after 13 years from the date of Order, we deem it appropriate to direct the Applicant/counsel for the applicant to file a fresh Representation/ Appeal with regard to the grievance (s) to the
2
PCDA (P) within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. SPARSH/PCDA (P) is directed to look into this long standing case of the applicant with regard to relief entitled to her and take appropriate steps within a further period of three months thereafter. The outcome thereof shall be intimated to the Applicant.
5. With the above directions, the MA Execution Application is disposed off. File be consigned to record.
(SANJIV MITTAL)
(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR) MEMBER (A)
MEMBER (J)
cda/-