Armed Forces Tribunal

Smt Dapoo Bai wdo Late AC-2 Meghwal KL vs UOI & Others on 29 January 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, JAIPUR

16.

MA(E) 70/2025 in OA 576/2012

Smt Dapoo Bai, wd/o Late AC2 Meghwal KL

…. Applicant

Versus

UOI & Others

…. Respondents

For Applicant

: Mr. MS Solanki, Pihu Singh Rajawat, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Pyare Lal, Advocate

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR, MEMBER (J)

HON’BLE MR. SANJIV MITTAL, MEMBER (A)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

29.01.2026

1. During the course of hearing, Counsel for the Applicant submits that compliance of Order dated 04/9/2012 passed by this Tribunal has not been complied with in letter and spirit, depriving the applicant of her legitimate dues.

2. We have perused the material on record.

3. Perusal of record reveals that vide Order dated 04/9/2012 in OA No 576/2012 filed by the applicant, this Tribunal had directed the PCDA to look into the matter from all aspects thoroughly and closely as narrated in the Order. Perusal of Annexure MA/2, also reveals that Central Bank of India, CPPC, Central Office, Mumbai – 400 023, had also raised the matter to the Treasury Office, Bundi, Rajasthan, with regard to grant of lifetime arrears of payment of family pension to the applicant wef April 1972 to November, 2015. The letter had also stated about the Family Pension having been paid to the applicant by the Treasury Office till 1972 and discontinued thereafter.

4. In view of the foregoing and since the OA was filed by the applicant after a delay of 40 years and the MA Execution Application itself was filed after 13 years from the date of Order, we deem it appropriate to direct the Applicant/counsel for the applicant to file a fresh Representation/ Appeal with regard to the grievance (s) to the

2

PCDA (P) within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order. SPARSH/PCDA (P) is directed to look into this long standing case of the applicant with regard to relief entitled to her and take appropriate steps within a further period of three months thereafter. The outcome thereof shall be intimated to the Applicant.

5. With the above directions, the MA Execution Application is disposed off. File be consigned to record.

(SANJIV MITTAL)

(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR) MEMBER (A)

MEMBER (J)

cda/-

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead