Armed Forces Tribunal

HMT Komal Kumar & Others vs UOI & Others on 12 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

OA No 65/2025 HMT Komal Kumar & 43 Ors Vs UOI & Ors ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, JAIPUR

S/1.

OA No 65/2026 with MA Nos 94/2026 and 95/2026

No-17029875X HMT Komal Kumar & 43 Others

…. Applicant

Versus

UOI & Others

…. Respondents

For Applicant

: Ms. Anjali Minocha, Advocate

For Respondents

: Mr. Gajendra Sharma, Advocate

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR, MEMBER (J)

HON’BLE MR. SANJIV MITTAL, MEMBER (A)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

12.03.2026

1. By way of this Application under Section 14 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act 2007, the Applicants have has filed this OA praying for following reliefs:- (a) To pass an appropriate order and direction in the nature thereof the impugned letter dated 3.7.2025 may kindly be quashed and set aside, the Respondents may kindly be directed to assign seniority to the Applicant HMT(s) higher than the Havildar with all its natural consequences.

(b) To direct the Respondents to fix and assign seniority to all Havildar Major Technical (HMT) incumbents of the Corps of EME at a level higher than the substantive rank of Havildar, with all consequential service and financial benefits including arrears of pay, allowances and MACP, from the date of appointment as HMT.

(c) Award cost of this Original Application in favour of the Applicant.

(d) Grant any other relief(s) as this Hon’ble Tribunal may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.

2. Heard the matter at length at the admission stage itself and perused the matter placed before the Court. After arguing the case at length, Learned Counsel for the Applicant seeks permission to withdraw the OA with liberty to file a representation before the Competent Authority with regard to the grievances of the Applicants in the OA.

OA No 65/2025 HMT Komal Kumar & 43 Ors Vs UOI & Ors

3. Accordingly, we deem it appropriate to accede to the prayer of the Applicant to withdraw the case with liberty to file a representation before the Competent Authority within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this Order. Needless to say, upon receipt of such representation, we expect the Competent Authority to decide such representation(s) expeditiously. The outcome thereof shall be intimated to the Applicant(s).

4. The OA is disposed off accordingly. Pending Miscellaneous Application(s), if any, also stand disposed off.

5. No order on costs.

(SANJIV MITTAL)

(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR) MEMBER (A)

MEMBER (J)

Ssy/-

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead