Armed Forces Tribunal
UOI & Others vs Ex Sgt Rugha Ram Nayak on 23 January 2026
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, JAIPUR
(CIRCUIT BENCH, JODHPUR)
(Through Video Conferencing)
6.
MA (E) 73/2024 in OA 56/2018
Ex Sgt Rugha Ram Nayak
…. Applicant
Versus
UOI & Others
…. Respondents
For Applicant
: Mr. A K Kaushik, Advocate
For Respondents
: Mr. Tribhuwan Singh, Advocate
alongwith
RA 06/2026 with MA 30/2026 in OA 56/2018
UOI & Others
…. Applicants
Versus
Ex Sgt Rugha Ram Nayak
…. Respondent
For Applicants
: Mr. Tribhuwan Singh, Advocate
For Respondent
: Mr. A K Kaushik, Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR, MEMBER (J)
HON’BLE MR. SANJIV MITTAL, MEMBER (A)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
23.01.2026
MA (E) No 73/2024 in OA No 56/2018
1. During the course of Virtual Hearing, Counsel for the Respondents prays for further time to comply with the Order passed by this Tribunal in this matter. Prayer is allowed and 14 weeks’ further time is granted to the Respondents in doing the needful in letter and spirit.
2. List the matter after 14 weeks.
2
RA No 06/2026 with MA No 30/2026 in OA No 56/2018
1. UOI has filed this Review Application, praying for review of Order dated 23/1/2024 passed by this Tribunal in OA No 56/2018.
2. We have heard the counsels for the parties and perused the material placed on record.
3. Perusal of record reveals that apart from a delay of one year, 10 months and 23 days in filing the Review Application, we do not find any error apparent on the face of the record, warranting review of Order ibid passed in merit.
4. In view of this Respondents shall comply with the Order as directed on MA (E) above within the time stipulated therein.
5. RA is dismissed. MA No 30/2026 filed for condonation of delay involved in filing the RA also stands disposed off.
(SANJIV MITTAL)
(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR) MEMBER (A)
MEMBER (J)
cda/-