Armed Forces Tribunal
UOI & Others vs Ex ACP Hav Naval Singh Gurjar on 5 February 2026
ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, JAIPUR
8.
RA 08/2026 with MA 44/2026 in OA No 167/2021
UOI & Others
…. Applicants
Versus
Ex ACP Hav Naval Singh Gurjar
…. Respondent
For Applicants
: Mr Gajendra Sharma, Proxy for
Mr. Pyare Lal, Advocate
For Respondent
: Ms Anjali Minocha, Proxy for
Ms. Savita Singh, Advocate
Major Vishi Singh, OIC Legal Cell, HQ 61 Sub Area
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE GOVERDHAN BARDHAR, MEMBER (J)
HON’BLE MR. SANJIV MITTAL, MEMBER (A)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
05.02.2026
1. During the course of hearing, Proxy Counsel for the Respondent – Applicant in the OA – sought adjournment on the Review Application filed by the UOI, praying for review of Order dated 28/8/2023 passed by this Tribunal. Review Application was filed on the ground that the applicant was discharged from service at his own request and was not superannuated
2. Perusal of record reveals that vide Order dated 28/8/2023 in OA No 167/2021, the Respondents were directed to grant one notional increment one day after the date of retirement of the applicant in terms of judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in this regard subject to verification of qualifying service rendered by the applicant therein.
3. Apart from a delay of two years, four months and two days in filing the Review Application, we do not find any error apparent on the face of record, warranting review of the Order passed in merit and based on the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court.
2
4. RA is dismissed accordingly. MA No 44/2026 filed for condonation of delay involved in filing the RA also stands disposed off.
5. Further, we grant six weeks’ time to the Respondents to comply with the Order dated 28/8/2023 after verifying the qualifying service rendered by the applicant. The Respondents are also directed to inform the applicant if he is not eligible for the benefit of one notional increment through a Speaking Order.
6. The file be consigned to record.
(SANJIV MITTAL)
(GOVERDHAN BARDHAR) MEMBER (A)
MEMBER (J)
cda/-