Delhi High Court

W.P.(C)/19060/2025 of M/S RST BATTERIES Vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CGST DELHI WEST & ORS. on 14 October 2026

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC011022722025 + W.P.(C) 19060/2025 and CM APPL. 79360/2025 M/S RST BATTERIES .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aman Sinha and Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advs. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CGST DELHI WEST & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anurag Ojha, SSC with

$~74

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC011022722025

+

W.P.(C) 19060/2025 and CM APPL. 79360/2025

M/S RST BATTERIES

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Aman Sinha and Mr. Rahul

Ranjan, Advs.

versus

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CGST DELHI WEST & ORS.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Anurag Ojha, SSC with

Mr. Dipak Raj and Mr. Aditya

Chaudhary, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHARAT PARASHAR

O R D E R

%

Page 1 of 2

14.10.2026

1. At present, there are three orders against the Petitioner. One order was passed on 03.02.2025, upon completion of the investigation. The other two orders were passed on 10.01.2025 and 23.01.2025, pursuant to the Show Cause Notices („SCNs‟) dated 02.08.2024.

2. The Petitioner contends that there is duplication in the aforesaid orders.

3. A copy of the reply/counter-affidavit filed by the Respondents is taken on record today. Paragraph 10 thereof reads as under:

10. That it is respectfully submitted that the proceedings initiated vide SCN No. 214/2024-25 dated 02.08.2024 & 202/2024-25 dated 02.08.2024 had been adjudicated vide O-I-O No. 348/2024-25 dated 10.01.2025 and O-I-O No. 405/2024-25 dated 23.01.2025, respectively may be considered for withdrawn, if found legally correct, being duplication of proceedings, as the demand involved in both these SCNs already stands adjudicated by the competent authority.” This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/10/2026 at 12:10:18

4. Learned counsel representing the Respondents states that the necessary corrective steps shall be taken by the competent authority within one week.

5. In view of the aforesaid statement, no further order is required to be passed.

6. Accordingly, the present petition, along with the pending application, stands disposed of.

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

BHARAT PARASHAR, J. OCTOBER 14, 2026/sp/ad

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/10/2026 at 12:10:18

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead