Delhi High Court
CRL.M.C./6105/2026 of BHARAT BHUSHAN GAUR AND ORS. Vs STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR. on 14 October 2026
6105/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages $~35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 14.10.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010387162026 + CRL.M.C. 6105/2026 BHARAT BHUSHAN GAUR AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Y.P. Sharma and Mr. Nikhil Bharti, Advocates with petitioners in person versus
Page 1 of 2 pages
$~35
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Date of Decision: 14.10.2026
CNR No. DLHC010387162026
+
CRL.M.C. 6105/2026
BHARAT BHUSHAN GAUR AND ORS.
.....Petitioners
Through:
Mr. Y.P. Sharma and Mr. Nikhil
Bharti, Advocates with petitioners in
person
versus
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR. .....Respondents Through:
Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State
with SI Priyanka
Mr. Prachi Sharma, Advocate for R2
with R2 in person
CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 207/2014 of Police Station Shahdara, Delhi for offence under Section 323/451/354/506/34 IPC on the basis of mediation settlement recorded on 23.10.2024 at Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi between them and the complainant de facto (respondent no. 2).
GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec 45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15 570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801 e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.10.14 17:32:32 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:14.10.2026 17:35:53 Signature Not Verified
Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2 pages
2. State has no objection to this petition. Statements of parties have already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar.
3. The respondent no.2 is present in court and is identified by IO/SI Priyanka. I have spoken with respondent no.2 in Hindi and it is stated by her that she has compromised all disputes with the petitioners. Respondent no.2 submits that since the petitioners are her in-laws and she is now living happily with her husband, though separate from the petitioners, now she does not wish to continue prosecution of petitioners.
4. Having spoken with respondent no.2, I am satisfied that it would be in the interest of justice not to push the parties through full dress trial.
5. Therefore, the petition is allowed and FIR No. 207/2014 of Police Station Shahdara, Delhi for offence under Section 323/451/354/506/34 IPC as well as proceedings arising out of the same are quashed.
GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) OCTOBER 14, 2026/as
GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec 45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1 5570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff80 1e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.10.14 17:32:19 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:14.10.2026 17:35:53 Signature Not Verified
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…