Delhi High Court

W.P.(C)/6465/2026 of N.K FASHION THROUGH IT PROPRIETOR MR. NARENDER AGARWAL Vs ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, DELHI EAST on 14 October 2026

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010210982026 + W.P.(C) 6465/2026, CM APPL. 31866/2026 and CM APPL. 31867/2026 N.K FASHION THROUGH IT PROPRIETOR MR. NARENDER AGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Naveen, Adv. versus ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX, DELHI EAST

$~62

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010210982026

+

W.P.(C) 6465/2026, CM APPL. 31866/2026 and CM APPL.

31867/2026

N.K

FASHION

THROUGH

IT

PROPRIETOR

MR.

NARENDER AGARWAL

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Naveen, Adv.

versus

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL GOODS

AND SERVICE TAX, DELHI EAST

.....Respondent

Through:

Ms. Aishwarya Nabh, Adv.

Mr. Akash Panwar, JSC along

with Mr. Shantanu Vidyarthi,

Adv.

Page 1 of 3

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHARAT PARASHAR

O R D E R

%

14.10.2026

1. The present Petition has been filed seeking issuance of an appropriate writ, setting aside the Show Cause Notice dated 28.09.2025, and the consequential Order-in-Original dated 31.12.2025 (to be read as „Impugned Order‟), vide which the demand of Rs. 37,27,799.80/- under IGST, along with a penalty at the rate of 10% of principal amount, was imposed upon the Petitioner.

2. Undisputedly the Petitioner has an effective alternative remedy of Appeal against the Impugned Order.

3. Learned counsel representing the Petitioner submits that the Impugned Order has been passed while relying upon a Report No.204 of the Directorate General of Analytics & Risk Management This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/10/2026 at 12:10:07

Page 2 of 3

(„DGRAM‟), a legible copy of which has not been supplied to the Petitioner. The aforesaid position stands disputed by learned counsel representing the Respondent.

4. In our considered view, this issue can very well be agitated before the Appellate Authority by way of an Appeal. In view of the availability of an effective alternative remedy, and recognizing the issue being sought to be adjudicated by this Court, we are not inclined to exercise our writ jurisdiction.

5. In view of the aforesaid, the present Petition, along with pending applications, is disposed of.

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

BHARAT PARASHAR, J. OCTOBER 14, 2026 s.godara/hr

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/10/2026 at 12:10:07

Page 3 of 3

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead