Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/1254/2023 of KAPIL ANAND Vs MANALI ANAND on 13 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010347772023 + CONT.CAS(C) 1254/2023 KAPIL ANAND .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kshitiz Mahipal, Advocate and Ms. Khairun Nisa, Advocate. versus MANALI ANAND .....Respondent Through: Counsel for Respondent (appearance not given) CORAM: HON'BLE MS.
$~21
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010347772023
+
CONT.CAS(C) 1254/2023
KAPIL ANAND
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Kshitiz Mahipal, Advocate and
Ms. Khairun Nisa, Advocate.
versus
MANALI ANAND
.....Respondent
Through:
Counsel for Respondent (appearance
not given)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
13.10.2026
1. Contempt Petition under Section 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner for breach of the Judgment and Order dated 03.04.2023 in HMA No. 976/2023 whereby the parties arrived at the mediated Settlement dated 27.04.2022 wherein they agreed that the Respondent shall bring the child, Master Nevaan on 2nd and 4th Saturday of each month for two hours i.e. from 5:00 PM to 7:00 P.M, at a public place and on 1st and 3rd Saturday of every month, the husband/Petitioner shall talk to the son over Video Calling for 15 to 20 minutes in the evening. It was also decided that the husband shall be allowed to meet his son one day prior Diwali, for three hours.
2. Learned counsel for the Respondent states that the child is being produced for the meeting but what transpires into the room with the child and the counselor and the Petitioner, is not known to the Respondent. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/10/2026 at 11:14:46
3. Considering that the child is being produced for the meeting, it cannot be said that there is any willful or contumacious breach of the Settlement dated 27.04.2022. The Petitioner, if not satisfied with the visitation rights, is at liberty to pursue his remedies, in accordance with law.
4. The Petition is disposed of accordingly.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J OCTOBER 13, 2026/RS This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/10/2026 at 11:14:46