Delhi High Court
ARB.P./1438/2026 of COLUMBIA HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs ASHWIN S MEHTA H U F & ORS. on 13 October 2026
1438/2026 and other conn. Page 1 of 4 $~3 & 4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010378832026 + ARB.P. 1438/2026 COLUMBIA HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Attul Bhuchar and Mr. Rajesh Chugh, Advs. versus ASHWIN S MEHTA H U F & ORS. .....Respondents
$~3 & 4
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010378832026
+
ARB.P. 1438/2026
COLUMBIA HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Attul Bhuchar and Mr.
Rajesh Chugh, Advs.
versus
ASHWIN S MEHTA H U F & ORS. .....Respondents Through:
Mr. Rajesh Pathak, Mr. Ishank
Gupta and Ms. Tripti Yadav,
Advs
4.
CNR No. DLHC010381182026
+
ARB.P. 1445/2026
SAREEN ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Attul Bhuchar and Mr.
Rajesh Chugh, Advs.
versus
ASHWIN S MEHTA H U F & ORS.
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Rajesh Pathak, Mr. Ishank
Gupta and Ms. Tripti Yadav,
Advs
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
JUDGMENT(ORAL)
%
13.10.2026
1. Learned Counsel for the parties, jointly pray that the present matters may be referred to mediation to explore the possibility of amicable settlement of disputes.
Page 1 of 3
2. Acceding to the same, with the consent of the parties, the matter is referred to the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre (SAMADHAN) and the parties are directed to appear in person or through their authorized representative along with their respective Counsel before the Mediation Centre on 17.10.2026.
3. Two weeks’ time is granted for exploring the possibility of settlement through mediation.
4. If mediation fails, the parties are also ad idem with respect to reference of the disputes to arbitration. There is no dispute with regard to the existence of a valid arbitration agreement between the parties.
5. It is well settled that, while exercising jurisdiction under Section 11 of the Act, the scope of enquiry is confined to examining the prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement1.
6. In the aforesaid circumstances, this Court finds no impediment in appointing a Sole Arbitrator.
7. Accordingly, Hon’ble Mr. Justice S.P. Garg, Delhi High Court (Retd.) (Mob. No.9910384627) is appointed as a learned Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes arisen between the parties. The learned Sole Arbitrator shall enter upon the reference within three weeks from the date of the mediation report recording failure of settlement.
1 SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Krish Spinning 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1754
Page 2 of 3
8. The learned Sole Arbitrator will proceed to the arbitration proceedings subject to furnishing requisite disclosures as required under Section 12(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 within three weeks of entering reference.
9. The arbitration shall be carried under the rules and aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre (“DIAC”). The learned Arbitrator shall be entitled to fees as per the Schedule of Fees maintained by the DIAC.
10. It shall be open to the parties to raise all pleas, including objection as to arbitrability and jurisdiction, before the learned Sole Arbitrator who shall decide the same in accordance with law.
11. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the amount in dispute is Rs 5.5 crores (approx.).
12. It is clarified that the observations made herein are only for the purpose of deciding the present petition. The learned Sole Arbitrator shall adjudicate the disputes with claims and counter claims independently and on their own merits, uninfluenced by any observations contained in the present order.
13. The Registry is directed to send a receipt of this order to Mr. S.P. Garg, learned Arbitrator through all permissible modes including email.
14. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in the above terms.
OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J OCTOBER 13, 2026/at
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…