Delhi High Court
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/811/2026 of LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED Vs ELENA POWER AND INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED (EPIL) & ANR. on 13 October 2026
1 $~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010495392026 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 811/2026 LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sima Gulati, Advocate. versus ELENA POWER AND INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED (EPIL) & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vijay K. Singh,
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 811/2026 1
$~33
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010495392026
+
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 811/2026
LARSEN AND TOUBRO LIMITED
.....Petitioner
Through:
Ms. Sima Gulati, Advocate.
versus
ELENA POWER AND INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED (EPIL) &
ANR.
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Vijay K. Singh, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
13.10.2026
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 29A (5) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and seeks fourth extension of the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal.
2. Lastly, the mandate was extended by this Court on 23.12.2025 when it was extended upto 30.09.2026.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the arbitral proceedings are already at the stage of final arguments and final arguments could not be heard and concluded because of the fact that one of the learned Arbitrator was indisposed. Attention has been drawn to one email dated 28.09.2026 sent by one of the learned Arbitrators which also indicates the same. He also submits that there is no representation from respondent No.1 before the Arbitral Tribunal.
4. Learned counsel for respondent No.2 has joined the proceedings on advance notice and has no objection to the prayer being allowed.
5. Keeping in mind the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the fact This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/10/2026 at 11:40:39
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 811/2026 2
that sufficient cause has been shown, the present petition is allowed and while regularizing the interregnum period, the mandate of Arbitral Tribunal is, hereby, extended for another period of six months to be reckoned from 30.09.2026.
6. Petition stands disposed of in aforesaid terms.
MANOJ JAIN, J OCTOBER 13, 2026/ss/sk This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/10/2026 at 11:40:39