Delhi High Court
CRL.M.C./7545/2026 of SAYED MAZHER Vs STATE NEW DELHI & ORS. on 13 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010483672026 + CRL.M.C. 7545/2026 & CRL.M.A. 31505/2026 SAYED MAZHER .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Naveen Malhotra, Mr. Ritvik Malhotra, Mr. Nilansh Malhotra, Advocates. versus STATE NEW DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yudhvir
$~123
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010483672026
+
CRL.M.C. 7545/2026 & CRL.M.A. 31505/2026
SAYED MAZHER
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Naveen Malhotra, Mr. Ritvik
Malhotra, Mr. Nilansh Malhotra,
Advocates.
versus
STATE NEW DELHI & ORS.
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP for
the State with Mr. Narender Kumar,
Advocate along with SI Jitendra, PS
CR Park.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R
%
13.10.2026
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), seeking modification of one of the conditions imposed by this Court vide order dated 14th October, 2025, in BAIL APPLN. 3925/2025, while exercising jurisdiction under Section 484 of the BNSS read with Section 528 thereof.
2. The condition sought to be modified reads as follows: “ii. The Applicant shall, once in every three months, mark his attendance before the local police station, i.e., Mahalinga Puram, PO Nungam Bakkam, Sub District Chennai - 60034 and this intimation shall be given to the jurisdictional P.S.”
Page 1 of 2
3. Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner is also an accused in another case in which the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, vide order dated 24th June, 2026, passed in BAIL APPLN. 1201/2026, has granted him bail subject to the condition that he shall not leave the State of Maharashtra without prior permission of the Trial Court.
4. It is, thus, contended that the aforesaid condition imposed by the Bombay High Court would conflict with the condition imposed by this Court, requiring the Petitioner to mark his attendance at the concerned police station in Chennai. It is further submitted that, under the aforesaid order dated 24th June, 2026, the Petitioner is also required to mark his attendance at the DCB, CID, Anti Extortion Cell Unit, Mumbai, on the first day of each calendar month between 11:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m., till the conclusion of the trial.
5. Having considered the submissions advanced and the conditions imposed by the respective Courts, this Court finds it appropriate to modify condition (ii) of the order dated 14th October, 2025. Accordingly, the Petitioner shall mark his attendance at the DCB, CID, Anti Extortion Cell Unit, Mumbai, in terms of the order dated 24th June, 2026, and shall intimate the Investigating Officer concerned in FIR No. 193/2022, registered at P.S. Chittranjan Park, Delhi, of his compliance with the said condition.
6. In the event the trial arising out of FIR No. 52/2022, registered in Mumbai, concludes before the conclusion of the trial arising out of FIR No. 193/2022, registered at P.S. Chittranjan Park, Delhi, the Petitioner shall, thereafter, resume marking his attendance at the local police station in Chennai, in terms of condition (ii) of the order dated 14th October, 2025.
7. The petition is disposed of in the above terms, along with the pending application(s), if any.
SANJEEV NARULA, J OCTOBER 13, 2026/ab
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…