Delhi High Court

CRL.M.C./7772/2026 of ASHOK & ORS. Vs STATE THROUGH ITS SHO & ORS. on 13 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

7772/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages $~70 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 13.10.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010496932026 + CRL.M.C. 7772/2026 & CRL.M.A. 32388/2026 ASHOK & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Anil Pandey, Advocate (through videoconferencing) with petitioners in

CRL.M.C. 7772/2026

Page 1 of 2 pages

$~70

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of Decision: 13.10.2026

CNR No. DLHC010496932026

+

CRL.M.C. 7772/2026 & CRL.M.A. 32388/2026

ASHOK & ORS.

.....Petitioners

Through:

Mr. Anil Pandey, Advocate (through

videoconferencing) with petitioners in

person

versus

STATE THROUGH ITS SHO & ORS.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State

with SI Mohit

Respondents no. 2 and 3 in person

CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 205/2017 of PS Tilak Nagar for offence under Section 308/323/341/506/34 IPC on the ground that the respondents no. 2 and 3 have compromised the disputes with the petitioners.

2. Learned APP for State, assisted by IO/SI Mohit, accepts notice and strongly opposes the petition taking me through MLCs of respondents no. 2 and 3, reflecting multiple injuries, including fracture of skull. GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4 5569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d155 70996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e2 6fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.10.13 17:34:15 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:13.10.2026 17:36:43 Signature Not Verified

CRL.M.C. 7772/2026

Page 2 of 2 pages

3. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that the respondents no. 2 and 3 are neighbours of petitioners and they have compromised the disputes without any monetary settlement, so the present FIR may be quashed.

4. Keeping in mind the extremely serious injuries inflicted on the respondents no. 2 and 3 by petitioners using iron rods, which were to such an extent that caused skull fracture, I do not find it a fit case to invoke inherent powers for quashing the subject FIR. The intensity of blows was so severe that it fractured the strongest bone of the human body and could have even been fatal. Exercise of inherent jurisdiction to quash such FIRs would certainly be not justified.

5. Therefore, the petition and the accompanying application are dismissed.

GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) OCTOBER 13, 2026/as GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45 569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557 0996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa , cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.10.13 17:34:04 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:13.10.2026 17:36:43 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead