Delhi High Court

W.P.(CRL)/3226/2026 of JAI ANMOL A. AMBANI Vs BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION AND ORS on 12 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010492432026 + W.P.(CRL) 3226/2026, CRL.M.A. 32051/2026 JAI ANMOL A . AMBANI …..Petitioner Through: Mr. Arshdeep Singh Khurana, Ms. Neeha Nagpal, Mr. Vishvendra Tomar, Ms. Tannavi, Mr. Sulakshan, Mr. Arjun Singh and Ms. Mehma Kaur, Advs.

$~61

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010492432026

+

W.P.(CRL) 3226/2026, CRL.M.A. 32051/2026

JAI ANMOL A. AMBANI

…..Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Arshdeep Singh Khurana, Ms.

Neeha

Nagpal,

Mr.

Vishvendra

Tomar, Ms. Tannavi, Mr. Sulakshan,

Mr. Arjun Singh and Ms. Mehma

Kaur, Advs.

versus

BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION AND ORS

…..Respondents

Through:

Ms. Radhika Bishwajit Dubey, CGSC

with Mr. Gurleen Kaur Waraich and

Mr. Kritarth Upadhyay, Advs. for R-1

& R-4.

Ms Rajni Gupta, SPP, CBI/R-2 with

Mr.

Shivender

Gupta

and

Mr.

Siddharth Shekhar, Advs.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAV

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

12.10.2026

1. Hybrid mode.

2. The request in the present petition is limited to the extent that Petitioner, merely seeks direction to the Respondents to disclose about any Look Out Circular (LOC) issued and still subsisting against him.

3. Learned CGSC for Respondent No. 1 & 4 and learned SPP for CBI/Respondent No. 2 appear on advance notice and submit that the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/10/2026 at 12:13:52

communication in question was directly addressed to Chief Immigration Officer and a copy was merely endorsed to Respondents. Learned CGSC further submits that the Respondent would consider the present writ petition as representation and would transmit the requisite information in a time- bound manner to the petitioner.

4. Learned counsel for Petitioner, being not averse to the proposition, has no objection to the abovesaid proposal and disposal of the petition itself in these circumstances.

5. In view of the above, present petition stands disposed of with the direction to Respondents to send the requisite communication to the Petitioner within four weeks from today.

6. The petition alongwith pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of accordingly.

VIMAL KUMAR YADAV, J OCTOBER 12, 2026/akc This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/10/2026 at 12:13:52

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead