Delhi High Court
CRL.M.C./3050/2026 of ABID ALI Vs RESHMA on 12 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010169482026 + CRL.M.C. 3050/2026 & CRL.M.A. 12423/2026 ABID ALI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Harsh Jaidka, Mr. Meghav Chawla, Advs. versus RESHMA .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAV O R D E R % 12.10.2026
$~20
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010169482026
+
CRL.M.C. 3050/2026 & CRL.M.A. 12423/2026
ABID ALI
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Harsh Jaidka, Mr. Meghav
Chawla, Advs.
versus
RESHMA
.....Respondent
Through:
None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAV
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
12.10.2026
1. Hybrid Mode.
2. None for Respondent.
3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner has placed on record the copy of the order dated 30.09.2026 along with the copy of the settlement agreement dated 23.09.2026, according to which all the requirements and conditions have been fulfilled, most importantly the payment of a sum of Rs.4,00,000/- pursuant to which only the Respondent herein Reshma has withdrawn her D.V. Act petition as reflected in the order dated 30.09.2026.
4. In view of the aforesaid developments, learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks that he may now be permitted to withdraw the sum of Rs.2,00,000/- deposited by him in the shape of FDR in Saket Court as per order dated 22.04.2026 passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Delhi. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/10/2026 at 11:07:38
5. He asserts that no responsibility or obligation remains to be fulfilled by the Petitioner, therefore, in terms of the settlement he may be permitted to withdraw the said FDR.
6. In view of these facts and circumstances, request of the counsel for the Petitioner, emanating from the settlement is allowed.
7. He is permitted to withdraw the FDR as referred above from the Court concerned.
8. Petition, as sought by Petitioner, stands disposed of accordingly.
VIMAL KUMAR YADAV, J OCTOBER 12, 2026/hk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/10/2026 at 11:07:38