Delhi High Court
W.P.(CRL)/3235/2026 of GAURAV SHARMA Vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS on 12 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010493872026 + W.P.(CRL) 3235/2026 GAURAV SHARMA …..Petitioner Through: Petitioner-in-person. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS …..Respondents Through: Mr. Amit Dogra, SPC with Mr. Manish Rawat, G.P. and Mr. Mohit Bokoliya, Advocate. Mr.
$~62
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010493872026
+
W.P.(CRL) 3235/2026
GAURAV SHARMA
…..Petitioner
Through:
Petitioner-in-person.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
…..Respondents
Through:
Mr. Amit Dogra, SPC with Mr.
Manish Rawat, G.P. and Mr. Mohit
Bokoliya, Advocate.
Mr. Anand V. Khatri, ASC (Crl.) for
State with SI Amit Sehrawat, PS S.P.
Badli.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAV
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
12.10.2026
1. Hybrid mode.
2. This is a petition under Article 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of BNSS filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking an independent CBI inquiry into the untimely death of petitioner’s mother including medical negligence by Dr. B.S. Ambedkar (BSA) Hospital, Rohini and Safdarjung Hospital, action against the erring police officials for dereliction of duty under Section 29 of Police Act, 1861 and direction for an FIR in Ct. Case no. 1913/2024 pending before learned Judicial Magistrate, Rohini Courts, Delhi.
3. Learned ASC for State appears on advance notice and accepts notice. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/10/2026 at 12:13:53
4. It is revealed by the contents of the petition and the submissions made that the Petitioner is already pursuing a remedy available to him under the law. His grievance is that there is no order on his application or the complaint under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. However, the writ jurisdiction sought to be invoked by the Petitioner is not available to him in these circumstances at this stage.
5. As such, in view of the availability of the alternative remedy and being pursued by the Petitioner, this petition is pre-mature and not maintainable and accordingly, stands dismissed.
VIMAL KUMAR YADAV, J OCTOBER 12, 2026/akc
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/10/2026 at 12:13:53