Delhi High Court

W.P.(C)/2892/2022 of OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY (INDIA) LIMITED. Vs COMMISSIONER OF VALUE ADDED TAX & ORS. on 12 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010072432022 + W.P.(C) 2892/2022 & CM APPL. 7773/2023 OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY (INDIA) LIMITED. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Udit Jain, Adv. (through VC). versus COMMISSIONER OF VALUE ADDED TAX & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Urvi

$~25

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010072432022

+

W.P.(C) 2892/2022 & CM APPL. 7773/2023

OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY (INDIA) LIMITED. .....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Udit Jain, Adv. (through VC).

versus

COMMISSIONER OF VALUE ADDED TAX & ORS.

.....Respondents

Through:

Ms.

Urvi

Mohan,

Mr.

Aakrti

Bhargava, Ms. Roshni Agarwal &

Mr. Sunit Kumar, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

12.10.2026

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time realizing that the decision dated 13.05.2022 rejecting the claim for interest on the security deposit is appealable, is not pressing this present petition with a liberty to avail statutory remedies however. A request is made that since this order was passed during the pendency of the present petition and thereafter the petition was amended, limitation for filing appeal be condoned.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents vehemently opposes the prayer for condoning the delay.

3. Considering that this petition is pending since 2022 and that during This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/10/2026 at 11:36:52

the pendency of this petition, the impugned order was passed whereby the controversy now is restricted only to grant of interest on the security amount, this petition is disposed of with liberty as prayed for. Pending application also stands disposed of.

4. Taking into account that the petition was pending in the eventuality of the petitioner filing an appeal within six weeks from today the authority concerned shall hear the appeal on merits and make an endeavor to dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible.

AVNEESH JHINGAN, J

SHAIL JAIN, J OCTOBER 12, 2026 ‘JK’

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/10/2026 at 11:36:52

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead