Delhi High Court
CS(COMM)/1389/2025 of CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN SAS & ANR. Vs KRISHNA ALIAS TINKU & ANR. on 12 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC011049012025 + CS(COMM) 1389/2025 and I.A. 32288/2025 and I.A. 32288/2025 I.A. 32289/2025 CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN SAS & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Dhruv Anand and Mr. Dhananjay Khanna, Advocates. versus KRISHNA ALIAS TINKU & ANR.
$~12
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC011049012025
+
CS(COMM) 1389/2025 and I.A. 32288/2025 and I.A. 32288/2025
I.A. 32289/2025
CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN SAS & ANR.
.....Plaintiffs
Through:
Mr. Dhruv Anand and Mr. Dhananjay
Khanna, Advocates.
versus
KRISHNA ALIAS TINKU & ANR.
.....Defendants
Through:
Mr. Amitesh Giroti, Mr. Nipun Gupta,
Mr. Arnab Sharma and Mr. Vansh
Malhotra, Advocates for D1 and D2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
12.10.2026
1. The present suit was filed by the plaintiffs praying for permanent injunction restraining infringement of their registered trade mark, passing off, damages, rendition of accounts and delivery up against the defendants.
2. During pendency of the proceedings, the parties were referred to mediation, where they arrived at a settlement, terms whereof have been reduced to writing in the form of settlement agreement dated 26.05.2026.
3. The settlement has been signed by the authorized representatives of the plaintiffs as well as defendant no.1 who is the proprietor of defendant no.2. The settlement has also been signed by the learned counsels for the parties.
4. This Court has gone through the terms of the settlement agreement This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/10/2026 at 11:13:57
dated 26.05.2026 and find the same to be lawful. Therefore, there is no impediment in recording the terms of settlement agreement dated 26.05.2026 and decreeing the suit in terms thereof.
5. Accordingly, the suit is decreed in terms of settlement agreement dated 26.05.2026, which shall form part of the decree.
6. Let decree sheet be drawn by the Registry in the above terms.
7. At this stage, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the plaintiff prays for the refund of court fees.
8. Since the parties have arrived at settlement with the intervention of the ADR mechanism and the suit has been disposed of in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the plaintiff is entitled to the refund of entire court fee. The Registry is accordingly, directed to issue a certificate in that behalf to the plaintiffs.
9. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
VIKAS MAHAJAN, J OCTOBER 12, 2026/jg/sj
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/10/2026 at 11:13:57