Delhi High Court

W.P.(C)/13053/2025 of SMT. PUSHPA DEVI AGGARWAL Vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. on 12 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010618622025 + W.P.(C) 13053/2025, CM APPL. 53429/2025 SMT. PUSHPA DEVI AGGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sana Ansari and Mr. I Ahmed Adv. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Bihu Sharma and Mr.

$~29

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010618622025

+

W.P.(C) 13053/2025, CM APPL. 53429/2025

SMT. PUSHPA DEVI AGGARWAL

.....Petitioner

Through:

Ms. Sana Ansari and Mr. I Ahmed

Adv.

versus

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS.

.....Respondents

Through:

Ms. Bihu Sharma and Mr. Nachiket

Kaul, Advs.

Ms. Arti Bansal ASC - MCD with

Ms. Shruti Goel, Adv.

Mr. Niraj Kumar, Sr. Central Govt.

Counsel for R4 With SI Mr.

Shubham Latian, PS-Kotwali

Mr. Sunil Goel, Mr. Akhilesh

Bhama and Ms. Dimple Aggarwal,

Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

12.10.2026

1. Considering learned counsel for the petitioner as also the MCD, at the outset, unequivocally submit that the MCD is free to take all necessary step(s)/ action(s)/ legal recourse(s) in furtherance of the advisory for dangerous building dated 16.07.2024 issued by it, to which learned counsel for the petitioner adds that the petitioner being the owner of the subject premises has ‘No Objection’ thereto, there is nothing remaining in the present petition. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/10/2026 at 11:48:35

2. Accordingly, the present petition alongwith the pending application, if any, is disposed of.

3. Needless to say, respondent no. 5 & 6 shall be at liberty to seek appropriate remedies in accordance with law.

SAURABH BANERJEE, J OCTOBER 12, 2026/da

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/10/2026 at 11:48:35

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead