Delhi High Court
W.P.(C)/3547/2024 of SUNIL KUMAR & ORS. Vs GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. on 12 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010117452024 + W.P.(C) 3547/2024 SUNIL KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Dr. S.S. Hooda, Mr. Aditya Hooda and Mr. Manpreet Singh, Advs. (9868280166) versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Astha Gupt, Adv. for
$~23
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010117452024
+
W.P.(C) 3547/2024
SUNIL KUMAR & ORS.
.....Petitioners
Through:
Dr. S.S. Hooda, Mr. Aditya Hooda
and Mr. Manpreet Singh, Advs.
(9868280166)
versus
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.
.....Respondents
Through:
Ms. Astha Gupt, Adv. for R1
(8826074954)
Mr. Vijay Kinger, Ms. Roopa
Nagpal, Mr. Rakesh Malhotra AND
Mr. Manas Sood, Advs. for R5 and
R6 (9818539996)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
12.10.2026
1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that at the time of filing of the present petition, Khasra No.606, Village Sabhapur admeasuring 26 bighas and 14 biswas of land was vacant, however, the same is contrary to the prayers sought in the present petition.
2. Further, though it is the case of the petitioner in the present petition that “... …some unscrupulous persons/ land mafia have been trying to encroach and take illegal possession of the Subject Land. Towards this end, unlawful construction is also being carried out on the Subject This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/10/2026 at 11:49:48
Land...”, however, learned counsel for the petitioners is unable to give a clear picture, particularly, since the filing of the present writ petition also, he is still not aware as to who all are actually occupying/ residing/ using the said premises, which are forming a part of the subject land involved herein.
3. Considering the same raises disputed questions of facts, as also, admittedly, that none of those who are actually occupying/ residing/ using the said premises, which are forming a part of the subject land involved herein have been impleaded by the petitioners in the present petition, the present writ petition is not maintainable in the present form.
4. Lastly, neither the assertions made and/ or grounds raised in the present petition nor the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners demonstrate any kind of violation(s) of the fundamental/ legal right(s) of the petitioners, thereby calling for any interference by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
5. In view of the aforesaid, the present petition is dismissed.
SAURABH BANERJEE, J OCTOBER 12, 2026/Ab
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 14/10/2026 at 11:49:48