Delhi High Court

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.)/160/2025 of INTERNATIONAL BONDED COURIERS Vs M/S CROSSBORDER LOGISTECH PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. on 12 October 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC011168922024 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 160/2025 & I.A. 11306/2025 INTERNATIONAL BONDED COURIERS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bharat Malhotra and Mr. Taksh Suri, Advs. versus M/S CROSSBORDER LOGISTECH PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. .....Respondents

$~70

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC011168922024

+

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 160/2025 & I.A. 11306/2025

INTERNATIONAL BONDED COURIERS .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Bharat Malhotra and Mr.

Taksh Suri, Advs.

versus

M/S CROSSBORDER LOGISTECH PRIVATE LIMITED &

ORS.

.....Respondents

Through:

Ms. Niyati Kohli and Mr.

Rishabh Parikh, Advs. for R-1.

Mr. Pratham Vir Agarwal, Ms.

Isha Kakkar and Mr. Pinank

Mehra, Advs. for R-2, 3 and 5.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA

ORDER(ORAL)

%

Page 1 of 2

12.10.2026

1. At the outset, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to raise all pleas before appropriate forum.

2. Leave and liberty, as aforesaid, is granted.

3. The present petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J OCTOBER 12, 2026/gunn Signed By:ANUBHAV TRIPATHI Signing Date:13.10.2026 18:57:41 Signature Not Verified

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead