Delhi High Court
RC.REV./287/2025 of SHRI RAJ KUMAR KHURANA Vs MST. SANOBAR SHAFI AND ORS on 12 October 2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010697152025 + RC.REV. 287/2025, CM APPL. 59670/2025 (Stay), CM APPL. 75540/2025 (Dir.) & CM APPL. 66946/2026 (Seeking dismissal of petition filed by R-1) SHRI RAJ KUMAR KHURANA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Satish Sahai and Ms. Malaika
$~11 & 12
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010697152025
+
RC.REV. 287/2025, CM APPL. 59670/2025 (Stay), CM APPL.
75540/2025 (Dir.) & CM APPL. 66946/2026 (Seeking dismissal of petition filed by R-1)
SHRI RAJ KUMAR KHURANA
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Satish Sahai and Ms.
Malaika Farhat, Advocates.
versus
MST. SANOBAR SHAFI AND ORS
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Amiet Andlay and Mr.
Arun
Kumar
Sharma,
Advocates for Respondent No.
1.
12
CNR No. DLHC011079592025
+
RC.REV. 4/2026, CM APPL. 443/2026 (Stay), CM APPL.
67013/2026 (Seeking dismissal of the petition filed by R-1) &
CM APPL. 70929/2026 (delay of 34 days in filing the affidavit)
AMRIT LAL KHURANA
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Ranjit Khatri, Mr. Rishi
Sehgal, Mr. Midhun Aggarwal
and
Ms.
Ritu
Dhingra,
Advocates along with Petitioner
in person.
versus
MST SANOBAR SHAFI AND ORS
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Amiet Andlay and Mr.
Arun
Kumar
Sharma,
Advocates for Respondent No.
1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN
SHANKAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
12.10.2026 RC.REV. 287/2025
1. The present Petition, filed under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, seeks to challenge the Judgment dated 19.05.2025 [“Impugned Judgement”], passed by the learned Additional Rent Controller-02, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi [“learned ARC”].
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties are ad idem that the Impugned Judgement can be set aside for a de novo consideration on the basis of the record which already exists.
3. In view thereof, the Impugned Judgement is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the learned ARC for de novo consideration on the material already on record.
4. The learned ARC is requested to accord his consideration as expeditiously as permissible and preferably within a period of one
(01) year from today.
5. List before the learned ARC on 30.11.2026.
6. The present Petition, along with pending Application(s), if any, stand disposed of in the above terms. RC.REV. 4/2026
7. The present Petition, filed under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, also seeks to challenge the Judgment dated 19.05.2025, i.e., the Impugned Judgement in RC.REV. 287/2025.
8. In view of the foregoing adjudication, since the Judgement impugned herein has already been set aside, learned counsel for the parties submit that the present Petition may also be disposed of in aforementioned terms.
9. Accordingly, the matter is remanded back to the learned ARC for de novo consideration on the material already existing on record.
10. The learned ARC is requested to accord his consideration as expeditiously as permissible and preferably within a period of one
(01) year from today.
11. List before the learned ARC on 30.11.2026.
12. The present Petition, along with pending Application(s), if any, stand disposed of in the above terms. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. OCTOBER 12, 2026/nd/DJ