Delhi High Court
CRL.M.C./7678/2026 of MR.AABID & ORS. Vs THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. on 12 October 2026
of 3 $~32 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010492002026 + CRL.M.C. 7678/2026 MR.AABID & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: All the petitioners in person with Ms. Suman Malik, Adv. versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh
$~32
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010492002026
+
CRL.M.C. 7678/2026
MR.AABID & ORS.
.....Petitioners
Through:
All the petitioners in person with Ms.
Suman Malik, Adv.
versus
THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF
DELHI AND ANR.
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the
R-1/State with IO ASI Deshpal Singh,
PS Narela.
Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv. for R-2 with
R-2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAV
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
12.10.2026
1. Hybrid mode. CRL.M.A. 32018/202 (exemption)
1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions, and subject to the condition that the requisite documents shall be filed as per Delhi High Court Rules.
2. Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 7678/2026
3. The present petition has been filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioners seeking quashing of FIR No. 585/2025 registered under Sections 85/316(2)/79/3(5) of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,
2023 (‘BNSS’) on the ground that the parties have amicably settled their disputes in terms of the settlement/ agreement dated 17.12.2025 entered into before the Mediation Centre, Rohini District Courts, Delhi.
4. The present FIR is an outcome of a matrimonial dispute between the complainant/respondent No. 2 (wife) and petitioner.
5. Learned APP for the State, submits that in the present case petitioner no.1 (husband), petitioner no.2 (mother in law), petitioner no.3 (brother in law), petitioner no.4 & 5 (sisters-in-law/jethani), petitioner no.7 & 8 (sister- in-law/nanad) were arrayed in the list of ‘accused persons’, are thus the petitioners here and respondent No. 2 is the only complainant/victim, being wife.
6. Learned counsels for the parties submit that after ironing out their differences the parties have settled their disputes and are happily living together since 17.12.2025 i.e. for a period of about 11 months.
7. Petitioners are present in Court and have been identified by their counsel as well as by the Investigating Officer. Respondent No. 2, who is also present in Court, has been identified by the Investigating Officer. Respondent No. 2 states that she is happily living with her husband i.e., petitioner for the last about 11 months and as of now, she has no complaint against her husband, who has assured her to be a good and caring husband. The husband/Petitioner endorses all these facts and undertakes to be caring, loving and respectful husband. She further states that she is giving this statement out of her own free will, volition and without any coercion. She also states that she has no objection if the present FIR and the consequent proceedings are quashed in view of the assurances extended by her husband.
8. Learned counsels for the parties submit that no other proceedings are pending between the parties.
9. The parties shall remain bound by the statements and undertaking made in Court today
10. In view of the above facts and since no useful purpose will be served in continuance of the present criminal proceedings, it is directed that the aforesaid FIR and the consequent proceedings arising therefrom are hereby quashed.
11. With the above directions, the petition is disposed of.
12. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed-of.
VIMAL KUMAR YADAV, J OCTOBER 12, 2026/bj