Delhi High Court

CONT.CAS(C)/398/2026 of PARAS RAM Vs DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. on 9 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010090302026 + CONT.CAS(C) 398/2026 PARAS RAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinod Dahiya, Ms. Shreya Garg, Mr. Bhaskar Dongwal and Mr. Aryan Singh, Advs. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Vashishtha,

$~7

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010090302026

+

CONT.CAS(C) 398/2026

PARAS RAM

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Vinod Dahiya, Ms. Shreya Garg,

Mr. Bhaskar Dongwal and Mr. Aryan

Singh, Advs.

versus

DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. .....Respondents Through:

Mr. Sanjay Vashishtha, SC for DDA

with Mr. Siddhartha Goswami and

Mr. Aditya Sachdeva, Advs.

Mr. Prashant Diwan, Govt. Counsel

for R-2 & 3.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

09.10.2026

1. The present Petition under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 had been filed against the non-compliance of the Order dated 21.08.2025 in W.P (C) 12669/2025, whereby the Petition was disposed of with the following directions: “8. In these circumstances, the impugned order dated 21.09.2021 is set aside, and the matter is remanded to the District Magistrate, North, Alternative Branch, GNCTD, for a fresh decision in accordance with law. Naturally, if it is found that the petitioner is ineligible on account of ownership of any other land which falls within the bar contemplated by the policy, that ground remains open to the respondents. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/10/2026 at 10:00:47

9. The writ petition, alongwith the pending applications, is disposed of in these terms.”

2. The learned counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3 has submitted that a matter was decided afresh vide Order dated 08.10.2026 and the copy of the Order is placed on record.

3. According to this Order, the Petitioner is entitled to an allotment of an alternative land of Residential Plot admeasuring 40 sq. yds as per his seniority, subject to the condition stated therein.

4. In view of the aforesaid, since the Order has been complied with, the present Petition is disposed of.

5. The rights of the Petitioner to pursue the matter with the DDA is left open.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J OCTOBER 9, 2026/dss This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/10/2026 at 10:00:47

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead