Delhi High Court

W.P.(C)/11853/2015 of EASTRON OVERSEAS INC Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. on 9 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC016583802015 + W.P.(C) 11853/2015 EASTRON OVERSEAS INC .....Petitioner Through: versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gibran Naushad, SSC with Mr. Suraj Shekhar Singh, Mr. Hasan Haider and Mr. Anish Mishra, Advs. for R-3.

$~14

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC016583802015

+

W.P.(C) 11853/2015

EASTRON OVERSEAS INC

.....Petitioner

Through:

versus

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Gibran Naushad, SSC with Mr.

Suraj Shekhar Singh, Mr. Hasan

Haider and Mr. Anish Mishra, Advs.

for R-3.

Mr. Vedansh Anand, SPC with Mr.

Shivam Kumar, Adv. for UOI.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

09.10.2026

1. This petition was filed against the Show Cause Notice dated 20.11.2014 (SCN). The issue raised was that the respondent issuing the SCN was not the proper officer. The issue is no longer res-integra and has been decided in favour of the department by the Supreme Court in the case of M/s Canon India Private Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs (Civil Appeal No. 1827 of 2018).

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly contends that during the pendency of the petition an adjudicating order has been passed, there is a remedy of statutory appeal and seeks liberty to avail statutory remedy. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/10/2026 at 10:45:13

3. The writ petition is disposed of with liberty to avail remedy in accordance with law against the adjudicating order.

4. There is no doubt in the eventuality the petitioner filing an appeal accompanied by an application for condonation of delay, the appellate authority shall consider the pendency of this petition. AVNEESH JHINGAN, J SHAIL JAIN, J OCTOBER 9, 2026/kp This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/10/2026 at 10:45:13

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead