Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/1454/2023 of DHARAMPAL Vs OM JHALANI on 9 October 2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010399292023 CONT.CAS(C) 1453/2023 RAJESH SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Priya Singh, Advocate. versus OM JHALANI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Praveen Aggarwal and Mr. Bharat Bagga, Advocates. 17 # CNR No. DLHC010399322023 +
$~16 & 17
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010399292023
CONT.CAS(C) 1453/2023
RAJESH SHARMA
.....Petitioner
Through:
Ms. Priya Singh, Advocate.
versus
OM JHALANI
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Praveen Aggarwal and Mr.
Bharat Bagga, Advocates.
17
CNR No. DLHC010399322023
+
CONT.CAS(C) 1454/2023
DHARAMPAL
.....Petitioner
Through:
Ms. Priya Singh, Advocate.
versus
OM JHALANI
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Praveen Aggarwal and Mr.
Bharat Bagga, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
09.10.2026
1. The above two Petitions under Section 2, 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act have been filed by the Petitioners against the Respondent for making false and frivolous allegations against the learned CMM in Crl. Revision Petition No.373/2023 titled ‘Om Jhalani vs. NCT of Delhi and Ors.’ in the proceedings pending before the learned ASJ (Electricity) North- West, Rohini, Delhi to scandalize and lower the authority of the learned This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/10/2026 at 10:01:17
CMM, North-West, Rohini, Delhi.
2. Learned counsel for the Respondent has submitted that these were the same remarks made in the Revision Petitions which were definitely not acceptable. The Respondent is repentant and has tendered the Affidavits of unconditional apology. The same be taken on record.
3. The unconditional apology is accepted.
4. The Petitions are disposed of with warning to the Respondent to be careful in future and refrain from making any remarks against the Presiding Officer/ the Judge.
5. The two Petitions stand disposed of accordingly.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J OCTOBER 9, 2026/va
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/10/2026 at 10:01:17