Delhi High Court

BAIL APPLN./3429/2025 of AMIT MUNDA Vs CUSTOMS on 9 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

3429/2025 & connected matters Page 1 of 2 $~1, 2 and 3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010663612025 + BAIL APPLN. 3429/2025 AMIT MUNDA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Aggarwal, Mr. Yasis, Mr. Naveen Panwar, Ms. Manvi Gupta & Ms. Aparna, Advocates. versus CUSTOMS

BAIL APPLN. 3429/2025 & connected matters

$~1, 2 and 3

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

#

CNR No. DLHC010663612025

+

BAIL APPLN. 3429/2025

AMIT MUNDA

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Aditya Aggarwal, Mr. Yasis, Mr.

Naveen Panwar, Ms. Manvi Gupta &

Ms. Aparna, Advocates.

versus

CUSTOMS

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Gibran Naushad, SSC with Mr.

Hasan Haider, Mr. Suraj Shekhar

Singh

&

Mr.

Anish

Mishra,

Advocates.

#

CNR No. DLHC010027172026

+

BAIL APPLN. 382/2026

SHALLOO ANSARI

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr.

Prashant

Pandey,

Mr.

Karan

Kumar,

Ms.

Sazia,

Mr.

Ankit

Chauhan & Ms. Yadvi, Advocates.

versus

NCT OF DELHI( THROUGH CUSTOM)

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Shubham Tyagi, SSC with Ms.

Navruti Ojha, Advocate.

#

CNR No. DLHC010089042026

+

BAIL APPLN. 996/2026 & CRL.M.A. 7600/2026

MIYA REYAZ

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Uday Chauhan & Mr. Anup Kr.

This is a digitally signed order.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/10/2026 at 09:56:35

BAIL APPLN. 3429/2025 & connected matters

Das, Advocates.

versus

CUSTOMS

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Gibran Naushad, SSC with Mr.

Hasan Haider, Mr. Suraj Shekhar

Singh

&

Mr.

Anish

Mishra,

Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 09.10.2026

1. After some hearing, counsel for the applicants submit that they would be satisfied if suitable directions are issued to the Trial Court to expeditiously examine the recovery witnesses on behalf of the prosecution.

2. Accordingly, the present bail applications are dismissed as withdrawn, with a direction to the Trial Court to expeditiously examine the recovery witnesses, preferably within a period of three (3) months from today.

3. Liberty is given to the applicants to approach the Trial Court after the recovery witnesses have been examined.

4. The applications stand disposed of.

5. It is made clear that no expression or observation has been made on the merits of the matter or on the aspect of Section 37 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. AMIT BANSAL, J OCTOBER 9, 2026 at This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/10/2026 at 09:56:35

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead