Delhi High Court

RFA/357/2021 of RUKMANI GUPTA Vs CHAHATI DEVI & ANR. on 9 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010317212021 + RFA 357/2021 & CM APPL. 35763/2021 RUKMANI GUPTA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Anuj P. Agarwala and Mr. Vipul Singh, Advocates. versus CHAHATI DEVI &ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rohit Kumar, Mr. Naveen Kumar, Mr. Sudhanshu

$~3

*

IN

THE HIGH

COURT OF

DELHI AT

NEW

DELHI

#

CNR No. DLHC010317212021

+

RFA 357/2021 & CM APPL. 35763/2021

RUKMANI GUPTA

.....Appellant

Through:

Mr. Anuj P. Agarwala and Mr. Vipul

Singh, Advocates.

versus

CHAHATI DEVI &ANR.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Rohit Kumar, Mr. Naveen Kumar,

Mr.

Sudhanshu

and

Mr.

Amrish

Ranjan Pandey, Advocates for R-1.

Mr. Rishabh Kapur, Advocate for R-2

through VC.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 09.10.2026

1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.

2. Learned Counsel for the appellant submitted that, as per the affidavit dated 21st September, 2026 of the appellant filed on record, the appellant shall vacate the suit property on or before 31st January, 2027 and shall obey the other undertakings as given in the said affidavit.

3. Learned Counsel for the respondent No. 1 submitted that, as per the affidavit dated 23rd September, 2026 of the respondent No. 1 filed on record, the respondent No. 1 is willing to permit the appellant to remain in occupation of the suit property until 31st January, 2027. Learned Counsel for the respondent No. 1 has also submitted that mesne profits shall not be pressed, provided the appellant and respondent No. 2 vacated the suit property on or This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/10/2026 at 10:30:42

before 31st January, 2027.

4. Learned Counsel for respondent No. 2 submitted that, as per the affidavit filed on behalf of respondent No. 2 filed on record, respondent No. 2 shall vacate the suit property within a period of four months. However, as on today, on instructions from the respondent No. 2, learned Counsel submits that respondent No. 2 shall vacate the suit property on or before 31st January, 2027.

5. The parties shall remain bound by the statements and undertakings made in the affidavits filed by them.

6. Learned Counsel for the appellant has submitted that, in view of the aforesaid affidavits and submissions, the appellant does not wish to pursue the present appeal and it be disposed of as withdrawn.

7. Accordingly, the present appeal is disposed of as withdrawn, along with all pending application(s), if any. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J OCTOBER 9, 2026/MR/TP This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/10/2026 at 10:30:42

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead