Delhi High Court
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.)/286/2026 of CLIME FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED Vs NUTRIKOSH INDIA LIMITED & ORS. on 9 October 2026
(COMM.) 286/2026 Page 1 of 4 $~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010313262026 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 286/2026 CLIME FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurabh Seth, Mr. Omar Ahmed, Mr. Shantanu Aggarwal, Mr. Abhinav Tyagi, Mr. Vineeth Varma Penmetsa, Ms.
$~52
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010313262026
+
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 286/2026
CLIME FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Saurabh Seth, Mr. Omar
Ahmed,
Mr.
Shantanu
Aggarwal, Mr. Abhinav Tyagi,
Mr. Vineeth Varma Penmetsa,
Ms.
Aparna
Tiwari,
Ms.
Neelampreet Kaur, Mr. Tuhin
Dey, Advs.
versus
NUTRIKOSH INDIA LIMITED & ORS.
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. B. Badrinath, Mr. Dhruv
Bhardwaj, Mr. Yashovardhan
Rathore, Advs. for R1 to R7.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
JUDGMENTORAL)
%
09.10.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. At the outset, learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that Respondent Nos. 1 to 7 are parties to the arbitration agreement, whereas remaining Respondents are veritable parties to the dispute.
2. He, therefore, submits that the Petitioner does not wish to press the present petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, qua the remaining Respondents.
3. However, he seeks liberty to file an appropriate application for their impleadment before the learned Arbitrator, if need arises. Leave 1 “Act” hereinafter
TRIPATHI
and liberty, as prayed for, are granted.
4. Parties are also ad idem that the matter may be referred to the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre (SAMADHAN) to explore the possibility of an amicable settlement of the disputes between the parties. Learned Counsel for the parties further request that a Senior Mediator be appointed to facilitate the settlement process.
5. Accordingly, with the consent, the matter is referred to the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre (SAMADHAN). The Mediation Centre is requested to appoint a Senior Mediator to facilitate the mediation proceedings. The parties are directed to appear before the Mediation Centre, either in person or through their duly authorised representatives, along with their respective counsel, on the date fixed by the Mediation Centre on 15.10.2026.
6. Three weeks’ time is granted for exploring the possibility of settlement through mediation.
7. If mediation fails, the parties are also ad idem with respect to reference of the disputes to arbitration. There is no dispute with regard to the existence of a valid arbitration agreement between the parties.
8. Parties are also agreeable to waiving the procedure prescribed for the appointment of an arbitrator under the arbitration agreement, as well as the procedure contemplated under the Act.
TRIPATHI
9. In the aforesaid circumstances, this Court finds no impediment in appointing a Sole Arbitrator.
10. Accordingly, Mr. Virender Kumar Bansal, Principal District Judge (Retd.) (Mob. No. 9910384709) is appointed as a learned Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes arisen between the parties. The learned Sole Arbitrator shall enter upon the reference within three weeks from the date of the mediation report recording failure of settlement.
11. The learned Sole Arbitrator will proceed to the arbitration proceedings subject to furnishing requisite disclosures as required under Section 12(2) of the Act within three weeks of entering reference.
12. The arbitration shall be carried under the rules and aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre (“DIAC”). The learned Arbitrator shall be entitled to fees as per the Schedule of Fees maintained by the DIAC.
13. It shall be open to the parties to raise all pleas, including objection as to arbitrability and jurisdiction, before the learned Sole Arbitrator who shall decide the same in accordance with law.
14. It is clarified that the observations made herein are only for the purpose of deciding the present petition. The learned Sole Arbitrator shall adjudicate the disputes with claims and counter claims
TRIPATHI
independently and on their own merits, uninfluenced by any observations contained in the present order.
15. The Registry is directed to send a receipt of this order to Mr. Virender Kumar Bansal, learned Arbitrator through all permissible modes including email.
16. The present petition under Section 9 shall be treated as Section 17 application before the learned Arbitrator in case mediation fails.
17. Interim orders granted vide order dated 21.07.2026 shall continue till the learned Sole Arbitrator considers the matter and passes an appropriate order.
18. Learned Sole Arbitrator is requested to consider the Section 17 application within a period of 30 days from the constitution of the Arbitral Tribunal.
19. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in the above terms.
OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J OCTOBER 9, 2026/at
TRIPATHI