Delhi High Court

CONT.CAS(C)/210/2026 of MEENAKSHI Vs TARUN KUMAR on 9 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010037132026 + CONT.CAS(C) 210/2026 & CM APPL. 7716/2026, CM APPL. 60697/2026 MEENAKSHI .....Petitioner Through: Mrs. Upma Shrivastava, Mrs. Sarika Jain , Ms. Alka Singh, Mr. Vipul Jain, Mr. Prashant Tomar and Mrs. Neha Singh, Advs. versus TARUN

$~6

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010037132026

+

CONT.CAS(C) 210/2026 & CM APPL. 7716/2026, CM APPL.

60697/2026

MEENAKSHI

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mrs. Upma Shrivastava, Mrs. Sarika

Jain , Ms. Alka Singh, Mr. Vipul Jain,

Mr. Prashant Tomar and Mrs. Neha

Singh, Advs.

versus

TARUN KUMAR

.....Respondent

Through:

Appearance not given.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

09.10.2026

1. Contempt Petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Section 12 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for violating the terms and conditions of the Meditation Settlement dated 22.07.2025, by the Respondent.

2. The Ld. Counsel for the Respondent states that the draft for quashing of Petition has already been mailed to the Petitioner, along with a copy of a Demand Draft. It is stated that the Respondent has always been willing to abide by the terms of the Meditation Settlement and is also willing to move the appropriate Petition for quashing of the FIR.

3. The only controversy which is being raised now, is that the draft is only of the principal amount but in the settlement, there was a default clause imposing of penalty on the Respondent in case, he failed to abide by the This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/10/2026 at 10:00:45

terms of the Settlement in filing the quashing Petition, in time.

4. Since both the parties have agreed to file the quashing petition, the present Petition is disposed of with a direction to the Respondent to file the quashing Petition within a week and that the Petitioner shall appear in the said proceedings. Moreover, whatever are the grievances in regard to absolute compliance of the Meditated Settlement, in terms of the money payable to the Petitioner, the same may be agitated before the Concerned Court.

5. The Petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J OCTOBER 9, 2026/dss This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/10/2026 at 10:00:45

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead