Delhi High Court
ARB.P./1601/2026 of INTEGRATED DEFENCE PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED Vs UNION OF INDIA on 9 October 2026
1600/2026& conn. Page 1 of 3 $~24 to 26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010421222026 + ARB.P. 1600/2026&I.A. 24516/2026 INTEGRATED DEFENCE PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ashish Khorana, Advocate. versus UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through:
$~24 to 26
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010421222026
+
ARB.P. 1600/2026&I.A. 24516/2026
INTEGRATED DEFENCE PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Ashish Khorana, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA
.....Respondent
Through:
Ms. Radhika Bishwajit Dubey,
CGSC
with
Mr.
Kritarth
Upadhyay, Advocate.
CNR No. DLHC010421242026
+
ARB.P. 1601/2026 &I.A. 24520/2026
INTEGRATED DEFENCE PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Ashish Khorana, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA
.....Respondent
Through:
Ms. Radhika Bishwajit Dubey,
CGSC
with
Mr.
Kritarth
Upadhyay, Advocate.
CNR No. DLHC010421252026
+
ARB.P. 1602/2026 &I.A. 24521/2026
INTEGRATED DEFENCE PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Ashish Khorana, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA
.....Respondent
Through:
Ms. Radhika Bishwajit Dubey,
CGSC
with
Mr.
Kritarth
Upadhyay, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
Signed By:ANUBHAV
TRIPATHI
Page 1 of 3
JUDGMENT(ORAL)
%
09.10.2026
1. Mr. Kritarth Upadhyay, learned Counsel along with Ms. Radhika Bishwajit Dubey, learned CGSC appears on behalf of the Respondent and submits that they have no objection to the appointment of an Arbitrator.
2. It is well settled that, while exercising jurisdiction under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961the scope of enquiry is confined to examining the prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement2.
3. In the present case, there is no dispute with regard to the existence of a valid arbitration clause between the parties.
4. Further, the parties are ad idem with respect to the reference of the disputes to arbitration. In the aforesaid circumstances, this Court finds no impediment in appointing a Sole Arbitrator.
5. Accordingly, Mr. Inderjit Singh, learned District Judge (Retd.) (Mob. No. 9910384742) is appointed as a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes arisen between the parties. The learned Sole Arbitrator shall enter upon the reference within two weeks from today.
6. The learned Sole Arbitrator will proceed to the arbitration proceedings subject to furnishing requisite disclosures as required 1“Act” hereinafter 2SBI General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Krish Spinning 2024 SCC OnLine SC 1754
TRIPATHI
Page 2 of 3
under Section 12(2) of the Act within two weeks of entering reference.
7. The arbitration shall be carried under the rules and aegis of Delhi International Arbitration Centre (“DIAC”). The learned Arbitrator shall be entitled to fees as per the Schedule of Fees maintained by the DIAC.
8. It shall be open to the parties to raise all pleas, including objection as to arbitrability and jurisdiction, before the learned Sole Arbitrator who shall decide the same in accordance with law.
9. It is clarified that the observations made herein are only for the purpose of deciding the present petition under Section 11(6) of the Act. The learned Sole Arbitrator shall adjudicate the disputes independently and on their own merits, uninfluenced by any observations contained in the present order.
10. The Registry is directed to send a receipt of this order toMr. Inderjit Singh, learned Arbitrator through all permissible modes including email.
11. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in the above terms.
OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J OCTOBER 9, 2026/pa
TRIPATHI
Page 3 of 3
Loading citations and judicial treatment…