Delhi High Court
CRL.A./817/2004 of ALI MOHAMMAD Vs THE STATE on 7 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010100832004 + CRL.A. 817/2004 ALI MOHAMMAD .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sunil Tiwari, Adv (through VC). versus THE STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP for State with SI Shubham, PS Kotwali. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL
$~12
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010100832004
+
CRL.A. 817/2004
ALI MOHAMMAD
.....Appellant
Through:
Mr. Sunil Tiwari, Adv (through VC).
versus
THE STATE
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP for
State with SI Shubham, PS Kotwali.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAV
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
07.10.2026
1. Hybrid mode.
2. The death of the Appellant has been verified and confirmed as reported.
3. In such circumstances, the appeal is abated inasmuch as LRs of the Appellant are not interested in pursuing with the appeal, as stated by the learned counsel appearing for the Appellant.
4. He also submits that the original documents of the surety may be returned.
5. In view of these facts the request made by the counsel for the Appellant that the surety bond has to be discharged, therefore, the surety shall be free to collect the original documents from the Trial Court Record / Registry.
6. The appeal, accordingly, stands disposed of as abated.
VIMAL KUMAR YADAV, J OCTOBER 7, 2026/hk This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2026 at 11:51:10