Delhi High Court
CRL.M.C./7557/2026 of DHARMENDER MAVI & ORS. Vs STATE OF NCT DELHI & ORS. on 7 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010483932026 + CRL.M.C. 7557/2026 DHARMENDER MAVI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate with petitioner No. 1 in person and petitioner no. 3 through VC. versus STATE OF NCT DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.
$~57
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010483932026
+
CRL.M.C. 7557/2026
DHARMENDER MAVI & ORS. .....Petitioners
Through:
Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate
with petitioner No. 1 in person
and petitioner no. 3 through
VC.
versus
STATE OF NCT DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through:
Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with
Ms. Shikha Singh and Mr.
Shubham Vashishth, Advocates
with SI Anil Kumar, PS-Okhla
Industrial Area.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
07.10.2026 CRL.M.A. 31536/2026 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application stands disposed of.
CRL.M.C. 7557/2026
1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, seeking quashing of FIR No. 488/2016, registered under Sections 341/356/379/509/354/506/34 IPC at Police Station Okhla Industrial Area and all the consequential This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2026 at 11:57:56
proceedings arising therefrom.
2. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submit that though the petitioners have entered into a settlement with the complainant, the complainant and her husband have since expired and the respondent no. 4 herein, who is the son of the complainant, is her legal heir.
3. On being asked, the respondent no. 4 says that besides him, the complainant has also left behind three daughters, but they are not arrayed as legal heirs in the list of respondents, nor their affidavits with regard to their no objection have been filed. Moreover, the complainant and her husband have been arrayed as respondents in the memo of parties despite the fact that they have since expired. The petition is, therefore, full of defects.
4. At this stage, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition.
5. The statement made by the learned counsel is taken on record and petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. RAVINDER DUDEJA, J OCTOBER 7, 2026/vaishali/sk This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2026 at 11:57:56