Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/434/2026 of TARUNA DAS AND ANR Vs SANJEEV KUMAR on 7 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010101292026 + CONT.CAS(C) 434/2026, CM APPL. 69672/2026 TARUNA DAS AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. O P Gulabani, Advocate with Petitioners. versus SANJEEV KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Praveen Singhai, Mr. Anil Bidhuri, Ms. Deepali, Ms.
$~17
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010101292026
+
CONT.CAS(C) 434/2026, CM APPL. 69672/2026
TARUNA DAS AND ANR
.....Petitioners
Through:
Mr. O P Gulabani, Advocate with
Petitioners.
versus
SANJEEV KUMAR
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Praveen Singhai, Mr. Anil
Bidhuri, Ms. Deepali, Ms. Himani,
Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
07.10.2026
1. Contempt Petition under Section 10 and 12 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, has been filed on behalf of the Petitioners against the Order dated 17.03.2025 whereby the learned Mahila Court has granted rent @Rs.15,000/- per month, to the Petitioners vide Order 17.03.2025.
2. It is stated that seven Executions are pending in which, one got satisfied, on account of attachment of the salary of the Respondent. However, in one Execution Petition, an Application has been filed for attachment of the salary of the Respondent, who is working in HCL Technologies while no such Application has been filed in remaining six Execution Petitions.
3. Considering the submissions made, it is evident that the appropriate remedy for the Petitioner, is to pursue the Execution. More so, when it is This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2026 at 11:42:46
evident that there is an income of the Respondent against which, the Execution can be settled, the Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioner, to file the Application for attachment of salary in the Execution where it has not filed and the Mahila Court shall expeditiously dispose of the Applications in case, the Respondent fails to abide by the Order of maintenance dated 17.03.2025.
4. Learned counsel for the Respondent states that he has been regularly complied with the interim maintenance order. He is at liberty to show the compliance to the Executing Court, which shall take due notice and pass appropriate orders.
5. The Petition is disposed of accordingly. The pending Application is also disposed of.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J OCTOBER 7, 2026/RS
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2026 at 11:42:46