Delhi High Court

W.P.(CRL)/3153/2026 of SUNIL Vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010481752026 + W. P. (CRL)3153/2026 SUNIL .....PETITIONER Through: Mr. Rahul Maurya and Mr. A . A . Siddiqui, Advs. with petitioner in person. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ....RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Amaan

$~35

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010481752026

+

W. P. (CRL)3153/2026

SUNIL

.....PETITIONER

Through:

Mr. Rahul Maurya and Mr. A. A.

Siddiqui, Advs. with petitioner in

person.

versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

....RESPONDENTS

Through:

Mr. Sanjay Lao, Sr. Adv. with

Mr.Amaan Usman, APP, Mr.Abhinav

and Ms. Priyam Aggarwal, Advs.

Inspector Kaushlesh Kumar Jha and

SI Shankar, PS Swaroop Nagar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARY

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA SAHAY SAXENA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

07.10.2026

1. The present writ petition is filed on behalf of petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking issuance of a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus by directing the respondents/concerned police authorities to trace and produce his wife-Mrs. Roshni Devi and the minor child V who left the petitioner’s residence along with her on 09.08.2026. He further seeks direction to produce the child before the competent authority and interim This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/10/2026 at 11:41:31

directions concerning his safety, education, welfare and custody be passed in accordance with law.

2. Petitioner’s wife, Mrs. Roshni Devi W/o Mr. Sunil is present in the Court along with her minor child ‘V’. She states that due to the conduct of the petitioner, she does not want to go back with the petitioner at present.

3. The statement of Mrs. Roshni Devi W/o Mr. Sunil is taken on record.

4. In view thereof, the writ petition stands disposed of.

VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J

NISHA SAHAY SAXENA, J OCTOBER 7, 2026/Kkn This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/10/2026 at 11:41:31

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead