Delhi High Court

CM(M)/702/2026 of ARUN KUMAR Vs PRIYA UPADHAYAY@KHUSHI on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010132182026 + CM(M) 702/2026 ARUN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Lokesh Kumar Mishra, Mr. Sahibe Alam, Mr. Abhishek Kaushik, Mr. R.C. Bhargav & Ms. Swarnika Bhargav Advs. versus PRIYA UPADHAYAY@KHUSHI .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE

$~74

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010132182026

+

CM(M) 702/2026

ARUN KUMAR

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Lokesh Kumar Mishra, Mr.

Sahibe Alam, Mr. Abhishek

Kaushik, Mr. R.C. Bhargav &

Ms. Swarnika Bhargav Advs.

versus

PRIYA UPADHAYAY@KHUSHI

.....Respondent

Through:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN

SHANKAR

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

07.10.2026

1. The present Petition was previously listed on 05.10.2026, on which date Mr. Dharmesh Kumar, proxy counsel, appeared on behalf of the Petitioner, sought the leave of this Court to withdraw the present Petition.

2. However, since it was noticed that Mr. Dharmesh Kumar was not the counsel on record for the Petitioner, the matter was listed today to ensure that there is no error while passing the Order for withdrawal.

3. Mr. Lokesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel on record enters appearance on behalf of the Petitioner. He, on instructions, submits that since the amount of Rs. 2,30,000/- as directed by Order dated 02.04.2026, as also as directed by Orders dated 20.04.2026 and 15.05.2026, has already been paid to the Respondent, there arises no This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2026 at 11:28:22

reason for the matter to be kept pending and he, therefore, on instructions, seeks the leave of this Court to withdraw the present Petition.

4. Leave, as sought for, is granted.

5. Accordingly, the present Petition, along with pending Application(s), if any, stands dismissed as withdrawn.

HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. OCTOBER 7, 2026/v/DJ

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2026 at 11:28:22

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead