Delhi High Court
CONT.CAS(C)/1376/2023 of AMIT GOEL Vs PRIYANKA RENWAL on 7 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010376592023 + CONT.CAS(C) 1376/2023, CM APPL. 20896/2026 AMIT GOEL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mayank Rai, Adv. versus PRIYANKA RENWAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep khurana (DHCLSC) and Mr. Shiven Khurana, advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS.
$~35
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010376592023
+
CONT.CAS(C) 1376/2023, CM APPL. 20896/2026
AMIT GOEL
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Mayank Rai, Adv.
versus
PRIYANKA RENWAL
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Sandeep khurana (DHCLSC) and
Mr. Shiven Khurana, advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
07.10.2026
1. Present Contempt Petition under Article 215 of Constitution of India read with Sections 11, 12 and 2(b) of Contempt of Courts Act has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner against the Respondent for wilful breach of Settlement Agreement and undertaking, both dated 04.07.2022 as well as joint statement dated 20.08.2022 in HMA 655/2022 and statements made in second motion of HMA 1091/2022 dated 18.10.2022.
2. Learned counsel for the Respondent has tendered unconditional apology by way of Affidavit, which is accepted.
3. It is submitted that during pendency of divorce proceedings, parties arrived at amicable settlement on 04.07.2022, whereby they took divorce by mutual consent. While first motion was accepted, but, at the time of second motion, Respondent was not willing to join the proceedings.
4. According to learned counsel for the Respondent, there was some dispute regarding gold chain, which became bone of contention and second This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/10/2026 at 10:46:27
motion could not be recorded. In these circumstances, he revived the Divorce Petition, which got disposed of vide Order dated 04.10.2024 and parties have now been divorced.
5. The only grievance of the Respondent now is that Divorce Petition got revived without issuing Notice to her and she is entitled to Rs.5,00,000/- at the time of second motion, as per statement dated 04.06.2022.
6. Whatever, the Respondent’s grievance, she is at liberty to seek remedy in accordance with law.
7. Nothing further survives in the present Petition, which is hereby, disposed of along with pending Applications.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. OCTOBER 07, 2026/R This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/10/2026 at 10:46:27