Delhi High Court
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/510/2026 of AMBUJ HOTEL AND REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR Vs MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS & ANR. on 7 October 2026
& connected matter. Page 1 of 2 $~40&41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010297222026 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 510/2026 AMBUJ HOTEL AND REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR .....Petitioner versus MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS & ANR. .....Respondents # CNR No.
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 510/2026 & connected matter.
$~40&41
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010297222026
+
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 510/2026
AMBUJ HOTEL AND REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD. THROUGH
ITS DIRECTOR
.....Petitioner
versus
MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS & ANR.
.....Respondents
#
CNR No. DLHC010299312026
+
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 511/2026
AMBUJ HOTEL AND REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD. THROUGH
ITS DIRECTOR
.....Petitioner
versus
MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS & ANR.
.....Respondents
Appearances:-
Mr. S.S. Sisodia, Advocate for petitioner.
Ms. Manisha Singh, Advocate for respondents.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 07.10.2026
1. These two petitions under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, are between the same parties. The petitioner seeks extension of the mandate of the common Arbitral Tribunal, which is in seisen of the disputes between the parties under two Master License This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/10/2026 at 11:14:57
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 510/2026 & connected matter.
Agreements dated 16.05.2014 and 01.08.2014.
2. The proceedings before the learned Arbitrator commenced in the year 2024, and the mandate has been extended once by the consent of learned counsel for the parties. The Tribunal’s mandate has since expired on 28.04.2026 in both the cases.
3. Ms. Manisha Singh, learned counsel for the respondents, consents to extension of the mandate of the Tribunal.
4. Although the prayer in the petition is for extension for a period of six months with effect from 29.04.2026, learned counsel on both sides are ad-idem that the mandate be extended for a period of six months from today, i.e. 07.10.2026. It is so ordered.
5. The petitions are disposed of. PRATEEK JALAN, J OCTOBER 7, 2026 ‘B’/KA/ This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/10/2026 at 11:14:57