Delhi High Court
W.P.(C)/17557/2024 of M/S SUNRISE METAL IMPEX Vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. on 7 October 2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010508822024 + W.P.(C) 11325/2024 & CM APPL. 46935/2024 M/S.SUNRISE METAL IMPEX .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Krishnamohan K Menon & Ms. Prerna Jain Kala, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kushal
$~70 &71
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010508822024
+
W.P.(C) 11325/2024 & CM APPL. 46935/2024
M/S.SUNRISE METAL IMPEX
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Krishnamohan K Menon &
Ms. Prerna Jain Kala, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Kushal Kumar, Senior
Panel Counsel with Ms.
Tanya Manik,ADV for R-1
Mr. Sumit K. Batra and Ms.
Priyanka Jindal, Advs. for
GNCTD.
Ms.Anushrer Narain, SSC with
Mr.Apurv Yadav , Adv.
~71
CNR No. DLHC010953262024
+
W.P.(C) 17557/2024 & CM APPL. 74773/2024
M/S SUNRISE METAL IMPEX
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Krishnamohan K Menon &
Ms. Prerna Jain Kala, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Kushal Kumar, Senior
Panel Counsel with Ms.
Tanya Manik,ADV for R-1
Mr. Vedansh Anand, SPC, with
Mr. Shivam Kumar (GP), Adv.
Mr. Sumit K. Batra and Ms.
Priyanka
Jindal,
Advs.
for
GNCTD.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHARAT PARASHAR
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/10/2026 at 11:37:47
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
07.10.2026
1. With the consent of learned counsel representing the parties, these two Writ Petitions shall stand disposed of
2. In both petitions, though the petitioner has an alternative remedy of appeal, learned counsel representing the Petitioner submits that Show Cause Notices do not meet with the requirement of law.
3. In these cases, a counter affidavit as well as additional counter affidavit has been filed by the Respondents.
4. After arguing the matters at length, learned counsel representing the parties have arrived at a consensus and jointly submit that the impugned orders may be set aside and the matters remitted back to the original authority to pass fresh order in accordance with law.
5. The Respondents shall be at liberty to amend Show Cause Notice or issue a corrigendum. The Petitioner shall be entitled to file a response thereto, whereafter the Adjudicating Authority shall proceed to decide the matter afresh.
6. The Petitioner, through his counsel, is directed to appear before the Adjudicating Authority on 13.10.2026 at 11:00 AM.
7. It is expected that the Adjudicating Authority shall decide the matter finally within a period of six months from the date of appearance.
8. With the aforesaid directions and observations, the petitions, along with pending applications, stands disposed of.
ANIL KSHETARPAL, J
BHARAT PARASHAR, J OCTOBER 7, 2026/DH/MN This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/10/2026 at 11:37:47