Delhi High Court

CRL.M.C./2196/2026 of SHAMIM @ MASTER & ORS. Vs STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010115992026 + CRL.M.C. 2196/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9028/2026 SHAMIM @ MASTER & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mohd. Zahid & Mohd. Dilshad, Advs. Petitioners-in-person (through VC) versus STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through:

$~15

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

#

CNR No. DLHC010115992026

+

CRL.M.C. 2196/2026 & CRL.M.A. 9028/2026

SHAMIM @ MASTER & ORS.

.....Petitioners

Through:

Mohd. Zahid & Mohd. Dilshad, Advs.

Petitioners-in-person (through VC)

versus

STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Ritesh Kumar Bahri, APP

SI Jatin Kaushik, DIU/NE

Respondent no.2-in-person (through

VC)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

% 06.10.2026

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as the ‘BNSS’) the petitioner is seeking quashing of FIR No. 342/2014, registered at Police Station Gokul Puri, Delhi, for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 419, 467, 471, 468, 506, 120B, and 34 Indian Penal Code,1860 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘IPC’), and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of the settlement arrived at between the parties.

3. Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State.

4. The petitioners and respondent No. 2 are present through video conferencing and have been identified by their counsel and the Investigating Officer concerned.

5. Respondent No. 2 lodged DD No. 35B dated 12.02.2014 at P.S. Gokul Puri, Delhi, pursuant to which FIR No. 342/2014 was registered against the petitioners. The petitioners were arrested from time to time and were subsequently released on bail. Upon completion of investigation, the chargesheet was filed, and charges were framed against all the petitioners under Sections 420/34 IPC, with an additional charge under Section 468 IPC against petitioner No. 5, Anees Pahlwan @ Jumma. The matter is presently at the stage of prosecution evidence.

6. During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties amicably settled their disputes vide settlement dated 21.07.2025 for a total sum of Rs.5,10,000/- towards full and final settlement. The settlement amount has been duly paid/adjusted in terms thereof, including the amounts lying deposited with the Trial Court and the sum of Rs.85,000/- paid to Respondent No. 2 through bank transfer. Respondent No. 2 has no objection to the quashing of the FIR and the proceedings arising therefrom.

7. On a query made by this Court, respondent No. 2, who has been identified by the IO, has categorically stated that he has entered into compromise, vide Settlement Agreements dated 21.07.2025, of his own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat. Therefore, he has no objection if the present FIR is quashed.

8. In view of the above, the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will and without any coercion; therefore, continuing the proceedings will serve no useful purpose and will only create further acrimony between them. It would thus be in the interest of justice to quash the above-mentioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.

9. Accordingly, FIR No. 342/2014, registered at Police Station Gokul Puri, Delhi, for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 419, 467, 471, 468, 506, 120B, and 34 of the IPC, 1860, along with all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, is hereby quashed.

10. The present petition is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of.

11. Copy of the order be communicated to the concerned Trial Court for necessary action and compliance.

12. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. MADHU JAIN, J OCTOBER 6, 2026/prg/b/yt

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead