Delhi High Court
W.P.(CRL)/3148/2026 of MUZAMMIL Vs THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. on 6 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010481492026 + W.P.(CRL) 3148/2026 & CRL.M.A. 31332/2026 MUZAMMIL .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person (through videoconferencing). versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC for
$~66
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010481492026
+
W.P.(CRL) 3148/2026 & CRL.M.A. 31332/2026
MUZAMMIL
.....Petitioner
Through:
Petitioner
in
person
(through
videoconferencing).
versus
THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC for State
(through videoconferencing) with Mr.
Alok Sharma and Ms. Pavitra Dixit,
Advocates with SI Jeetendra and ASI
Satendra, PS Bharat Nagar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
%
06.10.2026
1. Petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 363/2026 of PS Bharat Nagar, Delhi for offence under Section 115(2)/117(2)/351(3)/75(3)/79/3(5) of BNS on merits.
2. Broadly speaking, the allegation levelled in the impugned FIR is that the petitioner was found in objectionable circumstances with wife of brother of the complainant de facto in a room in a hotel. The present petitioner as well as the wife of brother of the complainant de facto are practicing advocates. On their being so caught in the hotel room, there was a scuffle in which the complainant de facto suffered a fracture. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/10/2026 at 13:55:12
3. The petitioner submits that some associate of the complainant de facto had captured the entire incident in a video clip which would clearly show that no harm was caused by the petitioner. It is submitted by petitioner that the said video was transmitted by someone to brother of the lady advocate, who was found with the petitioner in that room. It is submitted that the said video has been handed over to the IO.
4. After addressing partly, the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition.
5. As requested, petition and the accompanying application are dismissed as withdrawn.
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J OCTOBER 6, 2026/dr This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/10/2026 at 13:55:12