Delhi High Court

CRL.M.C./6390/2026 of NAIMPAAL & ANR. Vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. on 6 October 2026

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010406642026 + CRL.M.C. 6390/2026 NAIMPAAL & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vishal and Mr. Badam Singh, Advocates along with Petitioners in person. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP for

$~21

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

#

CNR No. DLHC010406642026

+

CRL.M.C. 6390/2026

NAIMPAAL & ANR.

.....Petitioners

Through:

Mr. Vishal and Mr. Badam Singh,

Advocates along with Petitioners in

person.

versus

THE STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

.....Respondents

Through:

Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP for the State

with

SI

Pankaj

Kumar,

PS

Bhajanpura

Mr. Shubham Kumar, Advocate for

R-2 along with R-2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN BHARDWAJ

O R D E R

% 06.10.2026

1. The present Petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the Petitioners seeking quashing of First Information Report No. 237/2013 dated 04.07.2013, registered at Police Station Bhajan Pura, North-East Delhi, under Sections 498-A, 406, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.

2. It is informed that the Parties have already been divorced vide Decree of Divorce dated 18.10.2019 with mutual consent.

3. Material on record indicates that a settlement has also been entered into between the Parties and a perusal of the same indicates that the daughter of the Parties shall remain with the mother. This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/10/2026 at 10:54:04

Page 1 of 2

4. It is made clear to the Petitioner No.1/father of the daughter that by way of this settlement, the rights of the daughters are not closed and are kept open.

5. The Complainant is identified by both, the Investigating Officer and the learned Counsel for the Complainant, who are present in Court today.

6. Accordingly, FIR No. 237/2013 under Sections 498-A, 406, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, along with all proceedings emanating therefrom, is hereby quashed.

7. In view of the above, the present Petition is disposed of. ARUN BHARDWAJ, J OCTOBER 6, 2026 Prateek This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/10/2026 at 10:54:04

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead