Delhi High Court

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/661/2026 of HARJIT SINGH BEDI Vs M/S BODHITREE TECHNOLOGIES(P) LTD on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

Page 1 of 2 $~61 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010391022026 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 661/2026 HARJIT SINGH BEDI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jagjit Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Preet Singh and Mr. Abhijeet Singh, Advocates. versus M/S BODHITREE TECHNOLOGIES(P) LTD

$~61

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010391022026

+

O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 661/2026

HARJIT SINGH BEDI

.....Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Jagjit Singh, Senior Advocate

with Mr. Preet Singh and Mr. Abhijeet Singh, Advocates.

versus

M/S BODHITREE TECHNOLOGIES(P) LTD

.....Respondent

Through:

Mr. Bharat Arora and Mr. Gourav

Arora, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

06.10.2026

1. This petition is filed on behalf of the Petitioner under Section 29(A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of mandate of the Sole Arbitrator.

2. Reply has been filed by the Respondent in which serious allegations are made that the Petitioner is delaying the conclusion of the arbitral proceedings. Learned counsel for the Respondent urges that evidence affidavit of RW-1 was filed on 21.05.2025 and thereafter, the proceedings have been adjourned for cross-examination at least 11 times. In this backdrop, it is submitted that the mandate should not be extended.

3. Mr. Jagjit Singh, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner disputes the allegations levelled. Without prejudice and on This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/10/2026 at 11:14:54

instructions, he submits that cross-examination of RW-1 will be concluded positively on the next date i.e., 09.10.2026 and no adjournment will be sought under any circumstances.

4. Taking the assurance of the Petitioner on record that cross- examination of RW-1 will be concluded by the Petitioner on the next date fixed by the learned Arbitrator and no further adjournment will be taken, this petition is allowed, extending the mandate of the learned Arbitrator by six months from 06.10.2026 and period between 17.08.2026 and 05.10.2026 is regularised.

5. Petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

JYOTI SINGH, J OCTOBER 6, 2026/YA This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/10/2026 at 11:14:54

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead