Delhi High Court
W.P.(C)/14793/2026 of LALIT KUMAR TAAK Vs DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY on 6 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010481352026 + W.P.(C) 14793/2026 LALIT KUMAR TAAK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pulkit Arora, Adv. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Akhil Mittal, ASC -DDA, alongwith Mr. Vineet Kumar Mishra, Ms. Riddhi Jain and Ms.Shayna
$~117
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010481352026
+
W.P.(C) 14793/2026
LALIT KUMAR TAAK
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Pulkit Arora, Adv.
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Akhil Mittal, ASC -DDA,
alongwith Mr. Vineet Kumar Mishra,
Ms. Riddhi Jain and Ms.Shayna Das
Pattanayak, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 06.10.2026
1. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs: “A. Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, including a writ of mandamus, directing the Respondent/DDA to issue and furnish to the petitioner certified copies of the allotment letter and demand letter pertaining to Flat No. 159-B, Second Floor, Category-D. Shivaji Enclave Extension, New Delhi-110027; B. Direct the respondent to consider and dispose of the Petitioner’s pending request/representation dated 25.09.2024, in accordance with law, within a time-bound period as may be This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/10/2026 at 12:02:07
prescribed by this Hon’ble Court;”
2. For the reasons stated in the petition, issue notice.
3. Mr. Mittal, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent.
4. Mr. Arora, learned counsel for the petitioner states that the petitioner would be satisfied if the writ petition is treated as a representation.
5. Mr. Mittal, learned counsel for the respondent has no objection.
6. In this view of the matter, the petition is accordingly disposed of by directing respondent to treat the petition as a representation, hear the petitioner/authorised representative in person and thereafter pass a detailed speaking order.
7. The needful shall be done expeditiously and not later than 6 weeks from today. JASMEET SINGH, J OCTOBER 6, 2026/jk This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/10/2026 at 12:02:07