Delhi High Court

CS(COMM)/600/2024 of ACC LIMITED Vs PIDILITE INDUSTRIES LIMITED AND ANR on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010426002024 + CS(COMM) 600/2024 and I.A. 34024/2024 ACC LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Ms. Kripa Pandit, Advocate. versus PIDILITE INDUSTRIES LIMITED AND ANR .....Defendants Through: Mr. Shashwat Rakshit, Advocate for D-1. CORAM: HON’BLE MR.

$~O-16

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010426002024

+

CS(COMM) 600/2024 and I.A. 34024/2024

ACC LIMITED

.....Plaintiff

Through:

Ms. Kripa Pandit, Advocate.

versus

PIDILITE INDUSTRIES LIMITED AND ANR

.....Defendants

Through:

Mr. Shashwat Rakshit, Advocate for

D-1.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

06.10.2026

1. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the matter stood settled between the plaintiff and defendant no.1, which is the contesting defendant, and the terms of settlement have been recorded vide settlement dated 01.09.2026 arrived before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre, which is on record. The defendant no.2 is stated to be only the proforma party.

2. Order XXIII, Rule 3 authorises the Court to pass a decree on a compromise wherein the parties to the dispute have made an arrangement to settle the dispute. It has been comprehensively stated in the provision that the settlement arrived at should meet the essentials laid down therein, namely, (i) the compromise is lawful (ii) it is reduced in writing (iii) it is This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/10/2026 at 11:30:41

duly signed by the parties arriving at the compromise.

3. The settlement has been agreed upon without fear or coercion and the parties appear to have entered into the settlement agreement on their own volition.

4. The Court is satisfied that the settlement has been arrived at between the parties following due procedure and meeting the essentials specified under Order XXIII, Rule 3. Therefore, the parties shall be bound by the aforesaid settlement agreement.

5. In view of the aforesaid, the civil suit stands decreed in terms of the settlement agreement.

6. The Registry is directed to draw-up a decree sheet.

7. The civil suit along with the pending applications stands disposed of. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J OCTOBER 6, 2026 aks This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/10/2026 at 11:30:41

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead