Delhi High Court

OMP (ENF.) (COMM.)/29/2026 of SPACE WORLD GROUP LLP ( FORMERLY NORTH TREE TELECONSULTING LLP) Vs SADA IT PARKS PVT LTD on 5 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

(COMM.) 257/2026 Page 1 of 2 $~66 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010048602026 + OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 29/2026 & EX.APPL.(OS) 193/2026 SPACE WORLD GROUP LLP ( FORMERLY NORTH TREE TELECONSULTING LLP) ....Decree Holder Through: Mr Amit Sibal, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Sahil

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 257/2026

$~66

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010048602026

+

OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 29/2026 & EX.APPL.(OS) 193/2026

SPACE WORLD GROUP LLP ( FORMERLY NORTH TREE

TELECONSULTING LLP)

....Decree Holder

Through:

Mr Amit Sibal, Sr. Adv. with

Mr.

Sahil

Narang,

Mr.

Madhavam Sharma and Ms.

Swati Panda, Advs.

versus

SADA IT PARKS PVT LTD

.....Judgement Debtor

Through:

Mr. Vivek Chib, Sr. Adv. with

Mr. Prabhas Bajaj, Mr. Rithvik

Mathur, Mr. Siddarth Sunil, and

Ms. Jaagriti Pandey, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA

ORDER(ORAL)

%

05.10.2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. It is apparent from the record that the stamp duty on the arbitral award sought to be enforced in the present petition was paid on 03.02.2026, which is undoubtedly beyond one month from the date of execution the award.

2. This is not in consonance with the scheme envisaged by the Indian Stamp Act, 18991, as applicable in NCT of Delhi and in line of the judgment passed by this Court in M/s URC Construction (P) Ltd. v. Airports Authority of India2.

1 “Act”, hereinafter 2 OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 155/2026 Signed By:GUNN Signing Date:06.10.2026 11:32:21 Signature Not Verified

O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 257/2026

3. At this stage, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the Decree Holder seeks leave to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to file it again as and when situation arises and after satisfying on the aspect of stamp duty along with penalty, if any, as per the Act and in line of the judgment passed by this Court in M/s URC Construction (supra).

4. Leave and liberty, as aforesaid, is granted.

5. The present petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.

6. At this stage, learned Senior Counsel for the Decree Holder prays that a direction may be issued to the Collector for expediting the matter.

7. Accordingly, the concerned Collector is directed to expedite the matter and decide it preferably within three weeks from the date of an application.

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J OCTOBER 5, 2026/gunn

Signed By:GUNN Signing Date:06.10.2026 11:32:21 Signature Not Verified

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead