Delhi High Court
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/785/2026 of GALAXY IEC INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Vs DCM SHRIRAM LIMITED on 5 October 2026
785/2026 Page 1 of 2 $~74 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010478032026 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 785/2026, I.A. 27546/2026 GALAXY IEC INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Raghav Anand and Ms. Ananya Gupta, Advocates. versus DCM SHRIRAM LIMITED
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 785/2026
$~74
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010478032026
+
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 785/2026, I.A. 27546/2026
GALAXY IEC INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Raghav Anand and Ms.
Ananya Gupta, Advocates.
versus
DCM SHRIRAM LIMITED
.....Respondent
Through:
Mr. Sanchit Gawri, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
ORDER (ORAL)
%
05.10.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 29(A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961 seeking extension of the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator for a further period of 12 months.
2. Vide order dated 30.09.2024 passed in ARB.P. 1526/2024, this Court appointed the learned Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. The learned Arbitrator entered reference on 24.10.2024.
3. It is submitted that the time taken in the proceedings was, inter alia, on account of the adjudication of an application under Section 17 of the Act, retrieval of the Petitioner’s documents through a Local 1 “Act” hereinafter Signed By:PRAGYA ARORA Signing Date:06.10.2026 12:30:32 Signature Not Verified
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 785/2026
Commissioner, amendment of the Statement of Claim and the subsequent CIRP proceedings, which affected the Petitioner’s ability to participate further.
4. It is further submitted that the delay is not attributable to the Petitioner or the learned Sole Arbitrator.
5. Issue notice.
6. Notice is accepted by Mr. Sanchit Gawri, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the Respondent.
7. Learned Counsel for the Respondent submits that he has no objection to the extension of the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator.
8. Considering the stage of the proceedings and the circumstances resulting in the delay, this Court finds that sufficient cause has been made out for extension of the mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator.
9. The mandate of the learned Sole Arbitrator is extended for a period of 12 months w.e.f. 08.10.2026.
10. The petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
11. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J OCTOBER 5, 2026/pa Signed By:PRAGYA ARORA Signing Date:06.10.2026 12:30:32 Signature Not Verified