Delhi High Court

W.P.(CRL)/1826/2026 of VICKY TANWAR & ORS. Vs THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. on 5 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010266762026 + W.P.(CRL) 1826/2026 VICKY TANWAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Karamveer, Advocate with petitioner no.1. versus THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anand V Khatri, ASC. Respondent no.2

$~22

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

CNR No. DLHC010266762026

+

W.P.(CRL) 1826/2026

VICKY TANWAR & ORS.

.....Petitioners

Through:

Mr.

Karamveer,

Advocate

with

petitioner no.1.

versus

THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Anand V Khatri, ASC.

Respondent no.2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

%

05.10.2026

1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 463/2025 of PS Badarpur for offence under Section 498A/323/34 IPC on merits.

2. On the very first date (01.07.2026), it was submitted that quashing of the subject FIR is sought as the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners and now they are living together.

3. But today, learned counsel for petitioners stated that this petition is based on merits and not on settlement as petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 are not living together.

4. Petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 are present in courtroom and it is submitted by both of them that they want to live together, though for past This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/10/2026 at 12:09:46

few days, they are living separately. Petitioner no.1 submits that he shall go to the maternal home of respondent no.2 to fetch her back. It is also submitted by both them that they have two sons aged 09 years and 05 years.

5. After some discussion, learned counsel for petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh after one year so that parties get settled in matrimony.

6. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought.

GIRISH KATHPALIA, J OCTOBER 5, 2026/ry

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/10/2026 at 12:09:46

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead