Delhi High Court
BAIL APPLN./3257/2026 of RAMPAL Vs STATE THROUGH SHO BHALSWA DAIRY on 1 October 2026
3257/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages $~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 01.10.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010368222026 + BAIL APPLN. 3257/2026 RAMPAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Sharma and Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocates. versus STATE THROUGH SHO BHALSWA DAIRY .....Respondent
Page 1 of 2 pages
$~5
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Date of Decision: 01.10.2026
CNR No. DLHC010368222026
+
BAIL APPLN. 3257/2026
RAMPAL
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Sumit Sharma and Mr. Neeraj
Kumar, Advocates.
versus
STATE THROUGH SHO BHALSWA DAIRY .....Respondent Through:
Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State
with IO/SI Sohan Thakur.
CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The accused/applicant seeks interim bail for a period of two months in case FIR No.292/2024 of PS Bhalswa Dairy for offence under Section 21/25/29 of NDPS Act.
2. The accused/applicant seeks interim bail on the ground that he has to participate in the partition of the property left behind by his father.
3. At the outset, learned APP for State, assisted by IO/SI Sohan Thakur, points out that earlier also, the accused/applicant filed interim bail GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec 45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15 570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801 e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.10.01 13:53:10 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:01.10.2026 14:16:32 Signature Not Verified
Page 2 of 2 pages application on the same grounds and that application was dismissed as withdrawn before a coordinate bench of this court vide order dated 07.05.2026. That being so, the present application is not even maintainable.
4. In response, learned counsel for accused/applicant submits that despite order dated 07.05.2026 of the coordinate bench, he was not taken to AIIMS for dental treatment. If that be so, the accused/applicant ought to have filed appropriate proceedings, but fresh interim bail application is not maintainable.
5. Even otherwise, participation of the accused/applicant in partition of the inherited property is not such a ground on which he deserves interim bail, ignoring the charges against him.
6. Therefore, the interim bail application is dismissed.
GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) OCTOBER 1, 2026/ry GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4 5569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15 570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e 26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.10.01 13:52:56 +05'30' Digitally Signed By:RAHUL YADAV Signing Date:01.10.2026 14:16:32 Signature Not Verified