Delhi High Court
RSA/24/2024 of RAZIA BEGUM & ORS. Vs SATISH KUMAR JAIN & ORS. on 1 October 2026
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010603202023 + RSA 24/2024 RAZIA BEGUM & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Naveen Kumar Meena, Advocate along with Mr. G.D. Ahmed- appellant no. 3 and also attorney of other appellants versus SATISH KUMAR JAIN & ORS. .....Respondents Through:
$~68
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
#
CNR No. DLHC010603202023
+
RSA 24/2024
RAZIA BEGUM & ORS.
.....Appellants
Through:
Mr. Naveen Kumar Meena, Advocate
along with Mr. G.D. Ahmed- appellant
no. 3 and also attorney of other
appellants
versus
SATISH KUMAR JAIN & ORS.
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Anuj Jain and Mr. Mritunjai
Singh, Advocates.
R-1 in person and also, attorney of
other respondents (Through VC).
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
% 01.10.2026
1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 58819/2024 & CM APPL. 64586/2026 (for substitution of LRs) in RSA 24/2024
2. These applications have been filed on behalf of the appellants under Order XXII Rule 4 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking substitution of the LRs of the deceased respondent No. 13 – Smt. Sarla Jain, respondent No. 14 – Smt. Raj Bala Jain and deceased respondent No. 2 – Sh. Raj Kumar Jain.
3. Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents has also submitted that he is also appearing for the LRs of the aforesaid deceased respondents. He submits that he has no objection to the applications being allowed.
4. Keeping in view the submissions made on behalf of learned Counsel for the parties, the applications are allowed. The LRs of the deceased respondents are accordingly brought on record. The amended memo of parties is stated to have been filed and placed taken on record. CM APPL. 68511/2026 (for allowing the application and decreeing the appeal in terms of the Memorandum of Settlement dated 17/09/2026)
5. This is a joint application filed on behalf of both the appellants and the respondents under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking disposal of the present appeal in terms of the Memorandum of Settlement dated 17th September, 2026 arrived at before the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre (‘DHCMCC’).
6. Respondent No.1 has appeared through VC and is also the attorney holder of all the respondents. The appellant no. 3 and attorney holder of all the appellants is present in person. The parties submitted that they have arrived at the settlement, as stated above, with their own free will and consent, without any coercion.
7. In view of the aforesaid settlement, the parties shall remain bound by the terms and conditions of the Memorandum of Settlement dated 17th September, 2026.
8. Keeping in view the facts as stated above, the impugned judgment and decree is set aside and the appeal is allowed in terms of the Memorandum of Settlement dated 17th September, 2026 (Annexure P-1). Decree sheet be prepared, accordingly.
9. The present appeal is disposed of along with the pending application (s), if any.
10. The next date already fixed before the Joint Registrar i.e., 13th October, 2026, stands cancelled. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J OCTOBER 1, 2026/nd/tp