Delhi High Court
ARB.P./1218/2026 of TATA COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED Vs INTELLECT DESIGN ARENA LIMITED & ANR. on 30 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010326912026 + ARB.P. 1218/2026 & I.A. 19449/2026 TATA COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitin Kala, Ms. Kanishka Rawat, Advs. versus INTELLECT DESIGN ARENA LIMITED & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ravinder
$~13
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
CNR No. DLHC010326912026
+
ARB.P. 1218/2026 & I.A. 19449/2026
TATA COMMUNICATIONS LIMITED
.....Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Nitin Kala, Ms. Kanishka
Rawat, Advs.
versus
INTELLECT DESIGN ARENA LIMITED & ANR.
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Ravinder Agarwal, Mr.
Manish Kumar Singh, Mr. Vasu
Agarwal, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA
ORDER(ORAL)
%
30.09.2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. At the outset, Mr. Nitin Kala, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, submits that the present petition is rendered infructuous on the ground that parties have already arrived at a settlement.
2. As both the parties have signed the mediation and conciliation agreement dated 21.09.2026, the cause of action does not survive.
3. Both parties undertake that they will abide by the settlement terms contained in the mediation and conciliation agreement dated 21.09.2026.
4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as infructuous.
OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J SEPTEMBER 30, 2026/at
Signed By:PRAGYA ARORA Signing Date:30.09.2026 19:45:58 Signature Not Verified